Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/punt-labs/quarry/findgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/punt-labs/quarryWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/punt-labs/quarry/find)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/punt-labs/quarry/find"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/punt-labs/quarry/find.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00223 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00112 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00045 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00022 |
Grade A, and why
find scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to find-dev — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Input
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
Use the full arguments text as the search query.
Task
Call mcp__plugin_quarry_quarry__find with query set to the arguments.
If the result says "No results", say so briefly.
Determine the query type:
-
Question — the query asks for an answer (starts with who/what/how/why/when/where, ends with
?, or contains phrases like "is the", "how to", "how do"): provide a concise direct answer based on the search results, citing the source document and page number for each claim. Do not dump the raw results. -
Keywords — the query is exploratory (keywords, phrases, topic names): emit the tool output exactly as returned — character for character, including the leading ▶ unicode character. Do not reformat, add commentary, wrap in code fences, convert to markdown tables, or add boxes around the output.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 24 lines · 4 tokens per session scan A 10766af550ea
find is a command published in the GitHub repository punt-labs/quarry (3 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 4 tokens to every session and 223 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to find-dev, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
setup-video-vision
Interactive setup wizard for claude-video-vision — configure backend, whisper, frames, and verify dependencies.
review-claims
Analyze patent claims for 35 USC 112(b) compliance - antecedent basis, definiteness, and claim structure.
review-formalities
Check patent application formalities (abstract, title, drawings per MPEP 608).
meeting-listen
Play back a completed meeting summary as a voiced debate between personas.
create-epo-patent
Create a complete EPO-compliant patent application from invention disclosure through filing-ready package.
vote
Assess whether a PR/FAQ should move forward with a structured go/no-go decision.