Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pwnk77/agentic-workflowsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pwnk77/agentic-workflows/reviewer)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pwnk77/agentic-workflows/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pwnk77/agentic-workflows/reviewer/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pwnk77/agentic-workflows/reviewer"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pwnk77/agentic-workflows/reviewer.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00015 | $0.05157 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.02063 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.01031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00516 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 534 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A d83510e9a734
reviewer is a command published in the GitHub repository pwnk77/agentic-workflows (59 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 5,157 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
margaret-guard
Security review of the pending changes on the current branch.
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
parallel-analyze
Multi-perspective analysis using parallel subagents. Analyzes code from architecture, security, performance, and testing viewpoints simultaneously.
review-code
Read ALL memory bank code rules + best practices, check the files that changed, and APPLY fixes so they adhere. The active counterpart to /scan (which is read-only). Use after an AI session, before commit, to make changed files compliant.
bump-plugin
Bump changed plugin and marketplace version.
cost-optimization-review
Run a pillar-scoped Well-Architected review focused on the Cost Optimization pillar.