Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffold. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffold/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffoldWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffold/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffold/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffold/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffold/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffold/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00231 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00115 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00046 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00023 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/review
Runs the code-reviewer agent on the current branch or specified files.
Usage
/review # review all changes vs main
/review src/module/ # review specific directory
/review src/module/file.py # review specific file
Instructions for Claude Code
- Run static analysis first:
uv run ruff check . --output-format=concise
uv run mypy src/ --no-error-summary
- Get changed files:
git diff --name-only main...HEAD
- Read each changed file and apply the code-reviewer agent checklist
- Produce the structured review report defined in
agents/code-reviewer.md - If no files changed vs main, review the files specified in the command argument
- If any changed file touches authentication, database queries, external API calls, or user-controlled input — append a note at the end of the review report: "Security-sensitive changes detected. Run
/security-reviewfor a dedicated vulnerability scan (SQL injection, XSS, auth flaws, insecure data handling)."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 30 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2e75750ebe96
review is a command published in the GitHub repository pyramidheadshark/claude-scaffold (4 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 231 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
sonarqube
Analyze SonarCloud quality issues for a specific PR.
review-pr
Perform a comprehensive code review of a pull request.
pr
Analyze changes, detect scope issues, and create a well-structured PR.
refactor
Analyze code for SOLID violations and suggest targeted improvements.
review
Deep code review command. Comprehensive code analysis across security, performance, and architecture.
audit-codebase
Codebase health audit scoring 7 categories with progression plan.