Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qazi0/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/qazi0/claude-plugins/deep-dive)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/qazi0/claude-plugins/deep-dive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/qazi0/claude-plugins/deep-dive/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/qazi0/claude-plugins/deep-dive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/qazi0/claude-plugins/deep-dive.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00025 | $0.00655 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00262 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00131 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00065 |
Grade A, and why
deep-dive scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 88 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deep Dive: $ARGUMENTS.topic
You are doing a comprehensive deep dive on $ARGUMENTS.topic in the repository: $ARGUMENTS.repo
Instructions
-
First, use
read_wiki_structurewithrepo_name: "$ARGUMENTS.repo"to get the full documentation structure -
Analyze the structure and identify ALL sections that might relate to "$ARGUMENTS.topic":
- Direct matches (sections named after the topic)
- Related concepts (e.g., for "authentication": sessions, JWT, OAuth, middleware, security)
- Implementation sections that might cover the topic
- Best practices or guides mentioning the topic
-
Use
read_wiki_contentsto read the most relevant sections (prioritize 3-4 key sections) -
Use
ask_questionwith multiple targeted questions to fill gaps:- "How does $ARGUMENTS.topic work in this project?"
- "What are the best practices for $ARGUMENTS.topic?"
- "What are common patterns for implementing $ARGUMENTS.topic?"
- "What are the configuration options related to $ARGUMENTS.topic?"
-
Synthesize everything into a comprehensive guide:
Overview
What is $ARGUMENTS.topic in the context of $ARGUMENTS.repo? Why does it matter?
Core Concepts
Key concepts and terminology you need to understand.
How It Works
Detailed explanation of how $ARGUMENTS.topic is implemented/handled.
Implementation Guide
Basic Implementation
# Step-by-step code for basic usageAdvanced Implementation
# More complex scenariosConfiguration Options
All relevant configuration options with explanations.
Option Type Default Description ... ... ... ... Best Practices
- Recommended approaches
- Performance considerations
- Security considerations (if applicable)
Common Patterns
Patterns frequently used in the community.
Anti-Patterns & Pitfalls
What to avoid and common mistakes.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 88 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A b947f6b83936
deep-dive is a command published in the GitHub repository qazi0/claude-plugins (10 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 655 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
deep-dive compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deep-diveqazi0/claude-plugins | Command | 10 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 25 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |