Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/qinye6/pi-ccg/spec-implgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/qinye6/pi-ccgWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00012 | $0.01891 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00945 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00378 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00189 |
Grade A, and why
spec-impl scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to spec-impl — 6 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Core Philosophy
- Implementation is pure mechanical execution—all decisions were made in Plan phase.
- External model outputs are prototypes only; must be rewritten to production-grade code.
- Keep changes tightly scoped; enforce side-effect review before any modification.
- Minimize documentation—prefer self-explanatory code over comments.
Guardrails
- NEVER apply 后端/前端模型 prototypes directly—all outputs are reference only.
- MANDATORY: Request
unified diff patchformat from external models; they have zero write permission. - Keep implementation strictly within
tasks.mdscope—no scope creep. - Refer to
openspec/config.yamlfor conventions. - USER GUIDANCE RULE: When suggesting next steps to the user, ALWAYS use CCG commands (
/ccg:spec-research,/ccg:spec-plan,/ccg:spec-impl,/ccg:spec-review). NEVER suggest/opsx:*commands to the user. If OpenSpec CLI returns error messages referencing OPSX skills, translate them to CCG equivalents. - TASKS FORMAT RULE: When generating or modifying
tasks.md, ALL tasks MUST use checkbox format (- [ ] X.Y description). Heading+bullet format will cause OpenSpec CLI to parse 0 tasks and block the workflow.
Steps
-
Select Change
- Run
openspec list --jsonto inspect Active Changes. - Confirm with user which change ID to implement.
- Run
openspec status --change "<change_id>" --jsonto review tasks.
- Run
-
Apply OPSX Change (Pre-flight Check)
- Call
/opsx:applyinternally to enter implementation mode:/opsx:apply - This will load the change context and guide you through the tasks defined in
tasks.md. - Note: This is an internal call. If this step fails, guide the user to re-run
/ccg:spec-impl. - HARD GATE: Check the returned
statefield:- If
state: "blocked"→ STOP immediately. Inform the user which artifacts are missing and suggest: "Run/ccg:spec-planto generate missing artifacts first." - If
progress.total === 0→ STOP immediately. Inform: "tasks.md has no parseable tasks. Run/ccg:spec-planto regenerate." - Only proceed to Step 3 when
state: "ready"andprogress.total > 0.
- If
- Call
-
Identify Minimal Verifiable Phase
- Review
tasks.mdand identify the smallest verifiable phase. - Do NOT complete all tasks at once—control context window.
- Announce: "Implementing Phase X: [task group name]"
- Review
-
Route Tasks to Appropriate Model
- Route A: {{FRONTEND_PRIMARY}} — Frontend/UI/styling (CSS, React, Vue, HTML, components)
- Route B: {{BACKEND_PRIMARY}} — Backend/logic/algorithm (API, data processing, business logic)
工作目录:
{{WORKDIR}}必须通过 Bash 执行pwd(Unix)或cd(Windows CMD)获取当前工作目录的绝对路径,禁止从$HOME或环境变量推断。如果用户通过/add-dir添加了多个工作区,先确定任务相关的工作区。For each task:
codeagent-wrapper --progress --backend <{{BACKEND_PRIMARY}}|{{FRONTEND_PRIMARY}}> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}{{GROK_MODEL_FLAG}}- "{{WORKDIR}}" <<'EOF' TASK: <task description from tasks.md> CONTEXT: <relevant code context> CONSTRAINTS: <constraints from spec> OUTPUT: Unified Diff Patch format ONLY EOF会话复用:保存返回的
SESSION_ID:({{BACKEND_PRIMARY}} →CODEX_PROTO_SESSION,{{FRONTEND_PRIMARY}} →GEMINI_PROTO_SESSION),Step 7 审查时复用。 -
Rewrite Prototype to Production Code Upon receiving diff patch, NEVER apply directly. Rewrite by:
- Removing redundancy
- Ensuring clear naming and simple structure
- Aligning with project style
- Eliminating unnecessary comments
- Verifying no new dependencies introduced
-
Side-Effect Review (Mandatory before apply) Verify the change:
- Does not exceed
tasks.mdscope - Does not affect unrelated modules
- Does not introduce new dependencies
- Does not break existing interfaces
If issues found, make targeted corrections.
- Does not exceed
-
Multi-Model Review (PARALLEL)
- CRITICAL: You MUST launch BOTH {{BACKEND_PRIMARY}} AND {{FRONTEND_PRIMARY}} in a SINGLE message with TWO Bash tool calls.
- DO NOT call one model first and wait. Launch BOTH simultaneously with
run_in_background: true.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 144 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A d0a5abfd725c
spec-impl is a command published in the GitHub repository qinye6/pi-ccg (10 stars, last pushed 8d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,891 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to spec-impl, differing in 6 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.