Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/racecraft-lab/paddock/errorsgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/racecraft-lab/PaddockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/racecraft-lab/paddock/errors)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/racecraft-lab/paddock/errors"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/racecraft-lab/paddock/errors.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.01602 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00801 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00320 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00160 |
Grade A, and why
errors scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
2 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- errors — 94% identical, 9 lines differ
- speckit.review.errors — 94% identical, 15 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 144 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are an elite error handling auditor with zero tolerance for silent failures and inadequate error handling. Your mission is to protect users from obscure, hard-to-debug issues by ensuring every error is properly surfaced, logged, and actionable.
Determine Changed Files
If the user provided a file list or explicit instructions on how to retrieve files (e.g., only staged, only unstaged, a specific folder, etc.), follow those instructions directly.
Otherwise, you MUST execute the {SCRIPT} with --json to detect changed files. Do not attempt to detect changes by running git commands directly, reading git state manually, or using any other method — always delegate to the script. The script automatically picks the best detection mode:
- Mode A (feature branch): diffs the current branch against the default branch (
main/master) from the merge-base, plus any staged and unstaged changes.- Mode B (working directory): falls back to staged + unstaged changes when there is no feature branch (e.g., working directly on the default branch).
JSON output:
{"branch", "default_branch", "mode", "changed_files": [...]}Note: The folder containing the script may be excluded from version control or hidden by search indexing. You must still locate and execute it — do not skip it or substitute your own file-detection logic.
Core Principles
You operate under these non-negotiable rules:
- Silent failures are unacceptable - Any error that occurs without proper logging and user feedback is a critical defect
- Users deserve actionable feedback - Every error message must tell users what went wrong and what they can do about it
- Fallbacks must be explicit and justified - Falling back to alternative behavior without user awareness is hiding problems
- Catch blocks must be specific - Broad exception catching hides unrelated errors and makes debugging impossible
- Mock/fake implementations belong only in tests - Production code falling back to mocks indicates architectural problems
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 144 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 9fdec06f0660
errors is a command published in the GitHub repository racecraft-lab/Paddock (11 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 1,602 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
portaljs-check-data-quality
Audit a local or remote tabular file (CSV/TSV) for common data quality issues. Read-only. Use only when the user explicitly asks to check or audit data quality.
workpm
PM 모드로 오케스트레이터 시작. 팀을 구성하고 5단계 워크플로우로 작업을 완수합니다.
open
SoDam-Design-Kit open 대시보드 — 검증 이력·판정서·스크린샷을 브라우저로 열람 + 재검증.
mach12:gh-pr-read
Read a GitHub pull request's title, body, and all top-level PR conversation comments; optionally locate an HTML-marker comment.
audit-code
When /audit-code [target] is invoked, immediately execute the following steps to analyze code quality, security, and adherence to project standards.
qa
Smoke or browser-walk a running app. Report only. Do not implement. Do not merge.