Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/titles)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/titles"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/titles/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/titles"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin/titles.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.00094 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00047 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00009 |
Grade A, and why
titles scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to titles — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Generate titles from the following content: $ARGUMENTS
Use the title-generator skill to create titles. Follow these steps:
- Read the source content thoroughly
- Generate 15-20 title variations across different styles
- Include platform-specific variations
- Rate each title by click-worthiness
- Save the output to the workspace folder
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 15 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A e2f913b00d60
titles is a command published in the GitHub repository Rainbowlight-pixel/claude-cowork-content-plugin (6 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 94 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to titles, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-quality-gate-agent-safety
You are reviewing a pull request for agent-safety risk: changes that alter how an autonomous agent behaves, what it can run, or what guardrails it must clear before acting.
pr-quality-gate-analyst
You are reviewing a pull request for code quality, impact, and maintainability.
pr-quality-gate-architect
You are reviewing a pull request for architectural design and system structure concerns.
pr-quality-gate-code-quality
You are reviewing a pull request for the maintainability of the code it changes: how cohesive, loosely coupled, encapsulated, testable, and non-redundant the touched code is, and whether the author left each file at least as clean as they found it.
pr-quality-gate-decision-rigor
You are reviewing a pull request for the quality of the reasoning behind a decision, not just the code that implements it.
pr-quality-gate-observability
You are reviewing a pull request for observability: can an operator understand what the new code does in production from its external outputs?