Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RapierCraftStudios/ForgeDockWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/quality-gate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/quality-gate/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/quality-gate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rapiercraftstudios/forgedock/quality-gate.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.31728 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.12691 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.06346 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.03173 |
Grade B, and why
quality-gate scanned grade B with 2 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Reads agent configuration directoriesmediumAgent snooping
.claude/, .codex/, .gemini/ hold keys, settings and other credentials a mod has no legitimate need for.
type forge_resolve >/dev/null 2>&1 || { setopt nonomatch 2>/dev/null || true; FORGE_SOURCED_ROOT='${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}'; for _r in "$(cygpath -u "${FORGEDOCK_HOME:-}" 2>/dev/null || printf %s "${FORGEDOCK_HOME:-}")" '${ Makes network callslowCapability
Not a fault in itself. Listed so you know the mod talks to something, and to what.
| SHELL | `.sh` files or scripts using `curl`/`wget` | The source is not reproduced here
Licensed AGPL-3.0
The repository is licensed AGPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago Changed · -68 lines 58a2eacd69f4
- 8d ago Changed · +84 lines scan A → B 9547f2fd98eb
- 9d ago Changed ea7394b0fbfa
- 10d ago Changed · +81 lines ca934cfaeae7
- 11d ago Changed · +1 lines beb540d302b0
- 1mo ago First seen · 1,731 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A 2a7e5ea9df27
quality-gate is a command published in the GitHub repository RapierCraftStudios/ForgeDock (119 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed AGPL-3.0. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 31,728 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it B with 2 findings (reads agent configuration directories, makes network calls). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-pr-ci
Review a pull request and post the review to GitHub (CI/automated use).
workflow-automate
Automate CI/CD pipelines, releases, and development workflows with GitHub Actions, pre-commit hooks, and infrastructure automation.
team-review
Launch a multi-reviewer parallel code review with specialized review dimensions.
pr-quality-gate-qa
You are a rigorous QA reviewer. Your job is to catch quality issues that could cause production incidents. Be skeptical and thorough.
pr-quality-gate-reliability
You are reviewing a pull request for production survivability: how the change behaves when its dependencies misbehave, time out, or fail.
default-ai-review
Extract findings from the provided diff. Rank by severity. Produce a structured review. Emit one recommendation.