Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rapozoantonio/memorykit. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rapozoantonio/memorykit/main/.github/prompts/review-code.prompt.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rapozoantonio/memorykitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapozoantonio/memorykit/review-code)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapozoantonio/memorykit/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rapozoantonio/memorykit/review-code/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rapozoantonio/memorykit/review-code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rapozoantonio/memorykit/review-code.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00006 | $0.00246 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00098 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00049 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
review-code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review the code changes in this conversation or the files I specify.
Review for:
- Scope creep: Did implementation add unnecessary changes?
- Security: Auth checks, input validation, secrets exposure
- Multi-tenant: Tenant isolation, query filtering
- Performance: N+1 queries, missing indexes
- Architecture: Business logic in correct layer
- Testing: Missing tests for critical logic
- Token waste: Unnecessary file reads, redundant operations
Focus on:
- Changes that were NOT explicitly requested
- Security/multi-tenant violations (CRITICAL)
- Performance issues
- Missing tests
Output format:
- ✅ What was done correctly
- 🔴 Critical issues (security, multi-tenant)
- 🟡 Important issues (performance, architecture)
- ⚠️ Scope creep detected (if any)
- 📊 Summary: Files changed, issues found, risk level
Be specific: reference file:line for each issue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 35 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 906e21e4e0ff
review-code is a command published in the GitHub repository rapozoantonio/memorykit (4 stars, last pushed 13d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 246 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-17.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor
Systematic code refactoring with smart scope detection.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
spec-trace-requirements
You are verifying that implementation changes trace back to specification requirements.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).