What the reviewer found
The /opsx:ask command for querying openspec docs. The flagged 'ignore previous instructions' text and HTML-comment example are the command's own prompt-injection defenses, not actual hidden directives, and 'Do NOT add caveats' just keeps its canned sensitive-data refusal terse.
What was read
The file as it ships in recca0120/code-quest:
.claude/commands/opsx/ask.md
What the static scan said
The scan flagged 3things. The reviewer kept 0 and dismissed 3 as false.
P1Instruction-override phrasing — false positiveP2Hidden instructions — false positiveAR2Strips warnings and disclaimers — false positive
How this review was made
Sonnet 5 read the files above on 7 September 2026 and answered three questions: is it dangerous to whoever installs it, is each scanner finding real, and what should the installer know. The verdict is bound to the file's hash; when the file changes, it is scanned afresh and reviewed again. A script that changes while the definition does not is not re-reviewed — that is a known gap. How the scan and the review work.