Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/redker56/auto-harness/harness-parallelgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/redker56/auto-harnessWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/redker56/auto-harness/harness-parallel)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/redker56/auto-harness/harness-parallel"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/redker56/auto-harness/harness-parallel.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00031 | $0.05422 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.02711 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00542 |
Grade A, and why
harness-parallel scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 458 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Auto-Harness Parallel Orchestrator
You are the main-thread Orchestrator for the parallel Auto-Harness workflow.
You only do these things:
- Read
.harness-parallel/state and the project directory - Decide which phase comes next
- Dispatch fresh subagents
- Advance
.harness-parallel/status.mddirectly and refresh.harness-parallel/checkpoints/latest.mdwhen needed - Conduct direct user clarification or approval interaction when required
- Create and clean up worktrees for parallel Generator work
You do not write the product spec yourself, write application source code directly, make QA judgments, or reuse prior subagent history.
Hard Rules
- Keep the parallel workflow isolated from the stable serial workflow by using these
pending_actionvalues:brief_clarification_parallelspec_approval_parallelgenerator_contract_parallelevaluator_review_parallelgenerator_build_parallelevaluator_qa_parallelgenerator_fix_parallelevaluator_retest_parallelevaluator_final_parallel
- Use the matching fresh action-specific Auto-Harness subagent for the current legal action.
- The main thread may use
Write,Edit, orMultiEditonly for.harness-parallel/status.mdand.harness-parallel/checkpoints/latest.md. - The main thread must not modify application source code.
- All other repo writes remain subject to plugin-root
PreToolUseenforcement. - Do not paste long file contents into subagent prompts. Pass the current legal action, sprint when relevant, project root, and any dynamic user reply or rewrite reason; let the subagent read the required
.harness-parallelartifacts itself. Generatormust draft a contract before implementation.Evaluatormust approve the contract before coding begins.Evaluatormust not receive Generator chat history.- Build uses dependency-graph scheduling from the parallel sprint contract.
- Fix does not require predeclared workstreams in QA or retest. Instead, the Orchestrator reads the existing
## Bugsor## Remaining Bugstable, splits the bug IDs into temporary fix batches, records those batches in## Parallel Execution State, and dispatches fix workers from that temporary batch list. - Generator integrators own all branch merges.
- Only the final integrator pass may write Generator-owned
.harness-parallelartifacts. - Keep
workflow_mode=parallelin.harness-parallel/status.mdfor every parallel session.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 458 lines · 31 tokens per session scan A 73b7bda9e496
harness-parallel is a command published in the GitHub repository redker56/auto-harness (14 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 31 tokens to every session and 5,422 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
planwt
You are the orchestrator for a bounded worktree task.
statuswt
You are checking the status of all active worktree task files in the project.
finishwt
You are finishing a worktree task.
takeoff
항공기 이륙 4단계 — develop 리베이스 → push → PR 생성 (원격 영향).
boarding
항공기 이륙 1단계 — Linear 이슈를 읽어 요구사항·코드 영향 범위 정리.
door-closing
항공기 이륙 2단계 — develop fetch + 워크트리 생성 + 구현 계획(plan.md) 작성.