Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/reese-allison/claude-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/reese-allison/claude-tools/init)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/reese-allison/claude-tools/init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/reese-allison/claude-tools/init/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/reese-allison/claude-tools/init"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/reese-allison/claude-tools/init.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00032 | $0.01396 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00013 | $0.00558 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00279 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00140 |
Grade A, and why
deep-init scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 151 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Deep Init - Hierarchical CLAUDE.md Generation
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (optional path for single directory)
Flow:
- No args → Run Phase 1-3
- With path → Skip to Phase 3 for that path only
Phase 1: Discovery
Skip if $ARGUMENTS has path.
Step 1a: Structure
Build the directory tree from git-tracked files:
git ls-files | xargs -n1 dirname | sort | uniq -c | sort -rn
For each directory, capture:
path- Directory pathfiles- List of git-tracked filenames in this dirfile_count- Number of direct filessubtree_file_count- Total files in subtreehas_manifest- Contains package.json, go.mod, Cargo.toml, pyproject.toml, etc.has_readme- Contains README.md
Step 1b: Semantic Context (if tools available)
If you have access to tools that can extract symbol signatures (class/function/type names) without reading full file contents, use them on directories with ≥3 files to gather:
symbols- List of symbol names and their kindsdomain_hints- Inferred from symbol names (e.g., AuthService → auth domain, StripeClient → integration)
This helps identify domain boundaries and integration points that aren't obvious from filenames alone.
Output: JSON tree structure with all directories and metadata (including symbols if available).
Phase 2: Judgment
Skip if $ARGUMENTS has path - use that as sole target.
Examine the full tree recursively. Identify directories warranting CLAUDE.md.
A directory qualifies if it is ANY of:
-
DOMAIN BOUNDARY - Distinct conceptual area (auth, billing, search). Cohesive files that belong together. Someone would work "in this domain."
-
INTEGRATION POINT - Connects to external systems. File names suggest external communication (webhook, client, adapter, api). Own config for external services.
-
SUB-APP - Self-contained application. Has entry points, routes, or own runtime. Could be extracted as standalone.
-
TECHNICAL COMPLEXITY - Specialized knowledge required. Non-obvious patterns that an AI agent would get wrong without guidance.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 151 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A dd5efd3a5266
deep-init is a command published in the GitHub repository reese-allison/claude-tools (9 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 1,396 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
deep-init compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| deep-initreese-allison/claude-tools | Command | 9 | 9mo ago | MIT | A | 32 | Claude Code |
| minutes-ideassilverstein/minutes | Command | 1.6k | today | MIT | A | 48 | Claude Code, OpenCode |
| learnReflexioAI/claude-smart | Command | 793 | 3d ago | Apache-2.0 | A | 14 | Claude Code |
| memory-storeverygoodplugins/mcp-automem | Command | 66 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 10 | Claude Code |
| analyze-contextRohiRIK/OpenLtm | Command | 30 | today | MIT | A | 39 | Claude Code |
| cc-memoryTheLobbi/claude | Command | 21 | 10d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| lians-recallLians-ai/Lians | Command | 17 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 19 | Claude Code |