Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to regexp-lin/llm-wiki-agent. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/regexp-lin/llm-wiki-agent/main/.claude/commands/wiki-graph.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/regexp-lin/llm-wiki-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/regexp-lin/llm-wiki-agent/wiki-graph)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/regexp-lin/llm-wiki-agent/wiki-graph"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/regexp-lin/llm-wiki-agent/wiki-graph.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00236 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00118 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00047 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00024 |
Grade A, and why
wiki-graph scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
88% identical to wiki-graph — 2 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Build the LLM Wiki knowledge graph.
Usage: /wiki-graph
First try running: pnpm dev:graph --open
If that fails (missing dependencies), build the graph manually:
- Use Grep to find all [[wikilinks]] across every file in wiki/
- Build a nodes list: one node per wiki page, with id=relative-path, label=title, type from frontmatter
- Build an edges list: one edge per [[wikilink]], tagged EXTRACTED
- Infer additional implicit relationships between pages not captured by wikilinks — tag these INFERRED with a confidence score (0.0–1.0); tag low-confidence ones AMBIGUOUS
- Write graph/graph.json with {nodes, edges, built: today}
- Write graph/graph.html as a self-contained vis.js page (nodes colored by type, edges colored by type, interactive, searchable)
After building, summarize: node count, edge count, breakdown by type, and the most connected nodes (hubs).
Append to wiki/log.md: ## [today's date] graph | Knowledge graph rebuilt
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 19 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 6aec39f26545
wiki-graph is a command published in the GitHub repository regexp-lin/llm-wiki-agent (15 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 236 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 88% identical to wiki-graph, differing in 2 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.