Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add reggiechan74/cc-plugins/plugin install math-paper-creatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/onboard)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/onboard/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/onboard"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/reggiechan74/cc-plugins/onboard.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.02274 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00910 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00455 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00227 |
Grade A, and why
onboard scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 191 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Onboard a Math Paper
Convert an existing markdown math paper into a fully validated .model.md document with working python:validate blocks. This is an interactive, section-by-section process — you will approve each validation block before moving on.
Step 1: Locate the file
Use the provided path argument. If no path is given, search with Glob for **/*.md (excluding *.model.md files). If multiple results are found:
- Show at most 20 matches and ask the user which one to onboard.
- If more than 20 matches exist, ask the user to provide a path directly.
Step 2: Guard rails
Before proceeding, check two conditions:
-
Already a
.model.mdfile? If the file ends in.model.md, tell the user: "This file is already a.model.mddocument. Use/math-paper-creator:checkto validate it or/math-paper-creator:statusto see its current state." Stop here. -
No math blocks? Read the file and check for
$$...$$display math blocks. If none are found, tell the user: "No display math blocks ($$...$$) were found in this file. There is nothing to onboard." Stop here.
Step 3: Read and analyze
Read the entire document. Identify:
- All sections (by heading level:
#,##,###, etc.) - All
$$...$$display math blocks and which section each belongs to - The mathematical model being described: sets, parameters, variables, expressions, constraints, objectives
Build a mental model of the paper's structure and mathematical content.
Step 4: Present overview
Show the user a summary:
- Number of sections containing math blocks
- Total number of display math blocks
- A high-level interpretation of the model, e.g.: "This paper describes a linear program for workforce scheduling with 3 sets, 5 parameters, 2 variables, and 4 constraints."
Ask the user to confirm or correct this interpretation. The user may respond with free-form corrections. If they do, re-interpret and re-present until the user confirms.
Do not proceed until the user explicitly confirms.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 191 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 5e1fe1a5c8f3
onboard is a command published in the GitHub repository reggiechan74/cc-plugins (7 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 2,274 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
paperspine
Start PaperSpine with automatic intake UI when configuration is missing.
camera-ready
Convert an accepted anonymous-submission LaTeX paper (AAAI/AIES/ACM-style) to camera-ready and implement the accepted reviews. Use when a paper is accepted with no rebuttal and you need to de-anonymize, add copyright, turn on section numbering, implement each reviewer's minor revisions, optionally move proofs to a…
bib-filter
Filter a LaTeX project's bibliography to the entries actually cited, with Overleaf-source resolution, temporary staging, validation, approval-gated canonical replacement, and compilation. Use before submission or after large revisions.
latex-polish
Inspect a cleanly compiling LaTeX document for source pathologies and rendered visual defects by linting and viewing selected PDF pages. Use when compilation succeeds but title pages, floats, tables, figures, or layout still need publication-quality review. Not for basic compilation health; use $latex-health-check.
latex
Compile one specified LaTeX document, resolve build errors, audit citations, and report build quality. Use when a .tex source must be built or a concrete compilation failure repaired. Not for corpus-wide build checks, visual polish after a clean build, or creating a project; use $latex-health-check, $latex-polish, or…
pipeline-manifest
Build a traceability manifest linking analysis scripts to inputs, outputs, and manuscript figures or tables. Use when documenting a computational pipeline or locating the source of a reported artefact. Not for verifying that paper claims match code outputs; use the code-paper auditor.