Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplate. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplate/main/.claude/commands/kiro:spec-status.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplate/kiro-spec-status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplate/kiro-spec-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplate/kiro-spec-status/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplate/kiro-spec-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplate/kiro-spec-status.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00005 | $0.00732 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00366 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00146 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00073 |
Grade A, and why
kiro:spec-status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
86% identical to spec-status — 19 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 96 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Specification Status
Show current status and progress for feature: $ARGUMENTS
Spec Context
Spec Files
- Spec directory: !
ls -la .kiro/specs/$ARGUMENTS/ - Spec metadata: @.kiro/specs/$ARGUMENTS/spec.json
- Requirements: @.kiro/specs/$ARGUMENTS/requirements.md
- Design: @.kiro/specs/$ARGUMENTS/design.md
- Tasks: @.kiro/specs/$ARGUMENTS/tasks.md
All Specs Overview
- Available specs: !
ls -la .kiro/specs/ - Active specs: !
find .kiro/specs/ -name "spec.json" -exec grep -l "implementation_ready.*true" {} \;
Task: Generate Status Report
Create comprehensive status report for the specification in the language specified in spec.json (check @.kiro/specs/$ARGUMENTS/spec.json for "language" field):
1. Specification Overview
Display:
- Feature name and description
- Creation date and last update
- Current phase (requirements/design/tasks/implementation)
- Overall completion percentage
2. Phase Status
For each phase, show:
-
✅ Requirements Phase: [completion %]
- Requirements count: [number]
- Acceptance criteria defined: [yes/no]
- Requirements coverage: [complete/partial/missing]
-
✅ Design Phase: [completion %]
- Architecture documented: [yes/no]
- Components defined: [yes/no]
- Diagrams created: [yes/no]
- Integration planned: [yes/no]
-
✅ Tasks Phase: [completion %]
- Total tasks: [number]
- Completed tasks: [number]
- Remaining tasks: [number]
- Blocked tasks: [number]
3. Implementation Progress
If in implementation phase:
- Task completion breakdown
- Current blockers or issues
- Estimated time to completion
- Next actions needed
Task Completion Tracking
- Parse tasks.md checkbox status:
- [x](completed) vs- [ ](pending) - Count completed vs total tasks
- Show completion percentage
- Identify next uncompleted task
4. Quality Metrics
Show:
- Requirements coverage: [percentage]
- Design completeness: [percentage]
- Task granularity: [appropriate/too large/too small]
- Dependencies resolved: [yes/no]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 96 lines · 5 tokens per session scan A 2ef63539754b
kiro:spec-status is a command published in the GitHub repository reinhardhq/claude-code-spec-boilerplate (2 stars, last pushed 1y ago), licensed MIT. It adds 5 tokens to every session and 732 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 86% identical to spec-status, differing in 19 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
dispatcher
Pick the next-best repo to work on across the portfolio — rank free repos, recommend one, claim its lease atomically, and route to the entry command.
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.