Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/restarter/lets-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/note)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/note"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/note/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/note"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/note.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00054 | $0.02288 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.00915 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00458 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00229 |
Grade A, and why
note scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 211 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Task Note
Add a note to the active task. For mid-work documentation - progress updates, research findings, decisions, context for future sessions.
This is a utility, not a flow step. Main flow handles documentation automatically:
/lets:commitrecords commits to the task/lets:donedocuments task completion/lets:endsaves session progress
Use /lets:note when you want to add extra context that doesn't fit those flows.
IMPORTANT: If the spec below invokes any deferred tool (e.g.
AskUserQuestion), you MUST load and call it as specified. Never skip the call, never substitute a default answer of your own — the tool invocation is part of the contract. This is critical.
Usage
/lets:note # interactive - pick a note type, add to the active task
/lets:note <free text> # use the text directly as the note (infer type)
/lets:note --session # RESUME snapshot of the whole session (aliases: --snapshot, --pre-compact, --compact)
/lets:note --team [text] # team worktree: a decision -> the team file's Decisions, a fact -> its Standing knowledge
Step 0: Argument Parsing
If --session (aliases --snapshot, --pre-compact, --compact) is passed -> run Session Snapshot Mode (below) INSTEAD of Steps 3-4: no type prompt, produce ONE recovery-grade snapshot. Do NOT run Step 1's interactive task prompt - the session-snapshot skill owns task detection (file-primary: ambiguity -> file only, no prompt), keeping this byte-identical to /lets:end --session. Then show the output below, NOT the generic Output box (no separate verify - the skill returns the path + task id, and /lets:end likewise just delegates and stops).
If --team is passed -> run Team Note Mode (below) INSTEAD of Steps 1-6: no task is needed and none is prompted for, no tracker verb runs. Then show its output, NOT the generic Output box.
Otherwise -> normal flow (Steps 1-6).
When to Use
- Research findings: "Investigated X, found Y"
- Design decisions: "Chose approach A because..."
- Blocker discovered: "Can't proceed until Z"
- Context dump: "Important info for next session"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today Changed · +20 lines · +14 tokens per session 86487c5dbfc5
- 19d ago Changed · +2 lines c025b4955f6c
- 28d ago Changed · +1 lines 9d83e4b1a425
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines · +12 tokens per session 56723d474b0b
- 1mo ago First seen · 185 lines · 28 tokens per session scan A e8b436e9dd1a
note is a command published in the GitHub repository restarter/lets-workflow (17 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 54 tokens to every session and 2,288 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
audit-security
Check baseline CI security hygiene against the Starter Series bar — gitleaks, CodeQL, dep audit, license check, --ignore-scripts, Dependabot grouped, secret-scanning, claude-code-security-review, claude-security-guidance. Read-only, complementary to Anthropic's in-session security guidance plugin.
code-quality-plan-creator
LSP-powered architectural code quality analysis - works with any executor (loop or swarm).
mr-description-creator
Generate and apply MR/PR description directly via gh or glab CLI (project).
agy-review
Send the current change set to Antigravity (agy) for a senior-reviewer code review.
review
Two-stage code review (spec compliance + code quality).
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.