opinion

opinion is a command for Claude Code from restarter/lets-workflow. It costs 13 tokens per session (4,591 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An analysis of a technical choice that asks several expert agents to examine the options and combines their views into a recommendation. It can also run an adversarial challenge of the analysis.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to compare architectures, libraries, tools, implementation approaches, or other engineering options and receive a clear recommendation.
Why use it?
It helps make a reasoned choice when solutions have trade-offs, such as compatibility, legacy constraints, time, or cost. You give the topic and it frames the decision instead of asking you to choose without analysis.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter. Also seen: mentions CLAUDE.md; mentions subagents; names the AskUserQuestion tool.

Runs only inside its plugin — its command needs a path that Claude Code sets for a plugin’s own hooks and for nothing else. Install the plugin, not this.

Part of the lets plugin — 20 skills, 26 commands, 16 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it to compare architectures, libraries, tools, implementation approaches, or other engineering options and receive a clear recommendation.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install

Getting it into your agent

This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.

Claude Code
/plugin marketplace add restarter/lets-workflow
Claude Code
/plugin install lets

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install lets, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 20 skills, 26 commands, 16 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for opinion

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for opinion

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 13 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 4,591 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00013 $0.04591
Opus 5.5 $0.00005 $0.01836
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00918
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00459

Measured 2d ago against content hash 5ba1b15fd5d0, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

opinion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/lets/commands/opinion.md · 386 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 386 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Technical Decision Analysis

Analyze technical decisions by launching expert agents in parallel. Each agent provides their perspective, then results are aggregated into a clear recommendation.

DO NOT ask the user which option to choose. Analyze and recommend.

IMPORTANT: If the spec below invokes any deferred tool (e.g. AskUserQuestion), you MUST load and call it as specified. Never skip the call, never substitute a default answer of your own — the tool invocation is part of the contract. This is critical.

Usage

/lets:opinion                 # Frame the decision interactively, then analyze
/lets:opinion <topic>         # Analyze the given decision
/lets:opinion ... --workflow  # Expert fan-out + adversarial challenge off-context via a Dynamic Workflow

Step 1: Frame the Problem

Parse the argument: strip a --workflow token if present (sets workflow mode); the rest is the topic. Mirror how /lets:plan strips --fast.

**Decision:** {what needs to be decided}
**Options:** A) ... B) ... C) ...
**Constraints:** {time, compatibility, legacy, budget}

Workflow execution flag

If --workflow is present, run the expert fan-out + challenge + synthesis inside a Dynamic Workflow instead of launching agents via the Task tool (Step 4 / 4.6 / 5 happen off-context; only the aggregate returns).

Choosing the execution path (interactive)

When --workflow was NOT explicitly passed:

  • If the Workflow tool is not available this session -> silently use the standard Task-based path. Do NOT show the option.
  • If the Workflow tool is available -> ask via AskUserQuestion:
AskUserQuestion(
  questions=[{
    question: "How should I run this analysis?",
    header: "Run mode",
    options: [
      { label: "Standard (Recommended)", description: "Experts via Task tool - full per-agent opinions visible inline" },
      { label: "Workflow", description: "Dynamic Workflow - off-context fan-out + challenge, only the recommendation returns" }
    ],
    multiSelect: false
  }]
)

Read the full file on GitHub · 386 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago Changed 5ba1b15fd5d0
  2. 19d ago Changed · +4 lines 0b458c7b46b1
  3. 20d ago Changed · +6 lines 16aa09e5c850
  4. 28d ago Changed d58775c0ab4f
  5. 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines e08bfb55b882
  6. 1mo ago First seen · 374 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 14ec2f4db961

Subscribe to this mod's changes

opinion is a command published in the GitHub repository restarter/lets-workflow (17 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 4,591 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.