Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add restarter/lets-workflow/plugin install letsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/opinion.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.04591 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.01836 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00918 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00459 |
Grade A, and why
opinion scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 386 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Technical Decision Analysis
Analyze technical decisions by launching expert agents in parallel. Each agent provides their perspective, then results are aggregated into a clear recommendation.
DO NOT ask the user which option to choose. Analyze and recommend.
IMPORTANT: If the spec below invokes any deferred tool (e.g.
AskUserQuestion), you MUST load and call it as specified. Never skip the call, never substitute a default answer of your own — the tool invocation is part of the contract. This is critical.
Usage
/lets:opinion # Frame the decision interactively, then analyze
/lets:opinion <topic> # Analyze the given decision
/lets:opinion ... --workflow # Expert fan-out + adversarial challenge off-context via a Dynamic Workflow
Step 1: Frame the Problem
Parse the argument: strip a --workflow token if present (sets workflow mode); the rest is the topic. Mirror how /lets:plan strips --fast.
**Decision:** {what needs to be decided}
**Options:** A) ... B) ... C) ...
**Constraints:** {time, compatibility, legacy, budget}
Workflow execution flag
If --workflow is present, run the expert fan-out + challenge + synthesis inside a Dynamic Workflow instead of launching agents via the Task tool (Step 4 / 4.6 / 5 happen off-context; only the aggregate returns).
Choosing the execution path (interactive)
When --workflow was NOT explicitly passed:
- If the
Workflowtool is not available this session -> silently use the standard Task-based path. Do NOT show the option. - If the
Workflowtool is available -> ask viaAskUserQuestion:
AskUserQuestion(
questions=[{
question: "How should I run this analysis?",
header: "Run mode",
options: [
{ label: "Standard (Recommended)", description: "Experts via Task tool - full per-agent opinions visible inline" },
{ label: "Workflow", description: "Dynamic Workflow - off-context fan-out + challenge, only the recommendation returns" }
],
multiSelect: false
}]
)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 5ba1b15fd5d0
- 19d ago Changed · +4 lines 0b458c7b46b1
- 20d ago Changed · +6 lines 16aa09e5c850
- 28d ago Changed d58775c0ab4f
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines e08bfb55b882
- 1mo ago First seen · 374 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 14ec2f4db961
opinion is a command published in the GitHub repository restarter/lets-workflow (17 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 4,591 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
audit-security
Check baseline CI security hygiene against the Starter Series bar — gitleaks, CodeQL, dep audit, license check, --ignore-scripts, Dependabot grouped, secret-scanning, claude-code-security-review, claude-security-guidance. Read-only, complementary to Anthropic's in-session security guidance plugin.
code-quality-plan-creator
LSP-powered architectural code quality analysis - works with any executor (loop or swarm).
mr-description-creator
Generate and apply MR/PR description directly via gh or glab CLI (project).
agy-review
Send the current change set to Antigravity (agy) for a senior-reviewer code review.
review
Two-stage code review (spec compliance + code quality).
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.