Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add restarter/lets-workflow/plugin install letsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/restarter/lets-workflow/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.24587 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.09835 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.04917 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.02459 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 1,531 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Full Code Review
Comprehensive code review with dynamic agent selection based on change types. Up to 12 specialized agents, tiered severity scoring. Works with:
- GitHub and Bitbucket PRs (posts a summary comment to the PR)
- Local changes (saves to file)
- Implementation plans (reviews
.lets/plans/files)
IMPORTANT: If the spec below invokes any deferred tool (e.g.
AskUserQuestion), you MUST load and call it as specified. Never skip the call, never substitute a default answer of your own — the tool invocation is part of the contract. This is critical.
Usage
/lets:review # Interactive - asks what to review
/lets:review <PR-url-or-number> # GitHub or Bitbucket PR
/lets:review --local # Uncommitted changes
/lets:review --staged # Staged changes only
/lets:review --last-commit # Last commit
/lets:review --branch # Full branch vs $LETS_MERGE_BRANCH (three-dot, like a PR)
/lets:review --plan # Review latest plan in .lets/plans/
/lets:review --plan <path> # Review specific plan file
/lets:review --file <path> # Review an existing file (full content, not diff)
/lets:review --workflow # Run via Dynamic Workflow (off-context fan-out); combinable with any code mode + --json
/lets:review --spec <path> # Use this file as the spec (skips the "where is the spec?" question)
/lets:review --spec none # There is deliberately no spec - review at full strength, no caveat
/lets:review --branch --fix # apply the verified fixes when nothing needs deciding (not with --json)
Step 1: Determine Review Mode
If argument provided:
- PR URL/number -> PR mode (host resolved below)
--local/--staged/--last-commit/--branch-> Local mode--plan/--plan <path>-> Plan review mode (skip to Plan Review section below)--file <path>-> File review mode - reviews entire file content, not a diff
Host resolution (PR mode). A PR argument picks the forge: a github.com URL -> gh; a bitbucket.org URL -> bbb (its PR number is in the /pull-requests/<n> path segment, not github's /pull/<n>); a bare number -> {LETS_PR_FLOW} (github -> gh, bitbucket -> bbb). Any other LETS_PR_FLOW with a PR argument: stop - PR review needs a github or bitbucket remote. Below, every step that shows a gh call has a bbb sibling for the bitbucket host; run whichever the resolution picked.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago Changed 5f52edcf042c
- 15d ago Changed · +2 lines 329299dda5b2
- 19d ago Changed · +6 lines f850910b0dc0
- 20d ago Changed · +30 lines 11635fe620b2
- 23d ago Changed · +28 lines 7ba5c391c26d
- 28d ago Changed · +12 lines ee602bb19563
- 1mo ago Changed · +2 lines 3fc8976ade4c
- 1mo ago Changed 4f02c5bc6451
- 1mo ago First seen · 1,451 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 8b3ab3f80cdf
review is a command published in the GitHub repository restarter/lets-workflow (17 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 24,587 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
audit-security
Check baseline CI security hygiene against the Starter Series bar — gitleaks, CodeQL, dep audit, license check, --ignore-scripts, Dependabot grouped, secret-scanning, claude-code-security-review, claude-security-guidance. Read-only, complementary to Anthropic's in-session security guidance plugin.
code-quality-plan-creator
LSP-powered architectural code quality analysis - works with any executor (loop or swarm).
mr-description-creator
Generate and apply MR/PR description directly via gh or glab CLI (project).
agy-review
Send the current change set to Antigravity (agy) for a senior-reviewer code review.
review
Two-stage code review (spec compliance + code quality).
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.