go

go is a command for Claude Code from retospect/precis-mcp. It costs 32 tokens per session (3,162 once invoked), scanned A, original, GPL-3.0.

A command for carrying an agreed software specification through implementation, merging it into the main code line, and deploying it to a cluster. A feature worktree is a separate working directory for a code change.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it from a feature worktree to implement the agreed specification, merge the result into main, and deploy it.
Why use it?
It combines the final delivery steps for a feature into one command when the work is ready to ship.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/retospect/precis-mcp/go
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/retospect/precis-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for go

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/retospect/precis-mcp/go.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/retospect/precis-mcp/go)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/retospect/precis-mcp/go"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/retospect/precis-mcp/go.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 32 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 3,162 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00032 $0.03162
Opus 5 $0.00016 $0.01581
Sonnet 5 $0.00006 $0.00632
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00316

Measured 4d ago against content hash 473a877330c4, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

go scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/go.md · 200 lines

The source is not reproduced here

Licensed GPL-3.0

The repository is licensed GPL-3.0, which this catalogue does not treat as permission to reproduce the file. Read it at the source.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 200 lines · 32 tokens per session scan A 473a877330c4

Subscribe to this mod's changes

go is a command published in the GitHub repository retospect/precis-mcp (3 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed GPL-3.0. It adds 32 tokens to every session and 3,162 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.