Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/revaya-ai/revaya-aios-workspace-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/revaya-ai/revaya-aios-workspace-template/process)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/revaya-ai/revaya-aios-workspace-template/process"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/revaya-ai/revaya-aios-workspace-template/process/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/revaya-ai/revaya-aios-workspace-template/process"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/revaya-ai/revaya-aios-workspace-template/process.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01033 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00517 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00207 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00103 |
Grade A, and why
process scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Process
Process the GTD inbox to zero. Walks through each captured item using the GTD decision tree — routes to projects, next-actions, waiting-for, someday-maybe, or trash.
Instructions
You are helping the user process their GTD inbox to zero. Every item gets a decision — nothing stays in the inbox.
Step 1: Load Inbox
- Read
gtd/inbox.md - If inbox is empty, report: "Inbox is at zero — nothing to process." and stop.
- Count items and report: "You have [N] items in the inbox. Let's process them."
Also read for context (so you can route items to the right places):
gtd/projects.md— existing projectsgtd/next-actions.md— existing actionsgtd/waiting-for.md— existing delegated itemsgtd/someday-maybe.md— existing backlog
Step 2: Process Each Item
Present items one at a time (or in small batches if clearly related). For each item, walk through the GTD decision tree:
Decision Tree
"Is this actionable?"
|
NO --> Ask:
| "Trash it?" --> Delete from inbox
| "Someday/Maybe?" --> Move to gtd/someday-maybe.md (choose category)
| "Reference?" --> Note where to file it
|
YES --> Ask:
"Does this connect to the One Objective or the current Bottleneck?" (soft check — see OOBG below)
|
"Is this a multi-step outcome?" --> YES: Add to gtd/projects.md
"What's the very next physical action?"
|
Takes <2 minutes? --> "Do it now."
|
Someone else should do it?
| YES --> Add to gtd/waiting-for.md (who, what, date)
|
I should do it, >2 min
Has a specific date/time? --> Calendar item
As soon as I can? --> Add to gtd/next-actions.md (choose context)
OOBG Alignment Check (Soft — Habit Building)
For actionable items, ask one question: "Does this connect to the One Objective or the current Bottleneck?"
This is not a hard gate — not everything has to directly address the Bottleneck. But it's a signal:
- If yes: route normally, flag as high priority if it's bottleneck-breaking
- If no and it's required work: route normally, add
[maintenance]note - If no and it's discretionary: consider "Is now the right time for this, or does it belong in Someday/Maybe?"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 112 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7c388718a074
process is a command published in the GitHub repository revaya-ai/revaya-aios-workspace-template (2 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,033 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
setup
Set up connect-apps - let Claude perform real actions in 500+ apps.
inventory
Track wiki-adjacent things the user cares about: items, Ideas, ingest candidates, entities, corpora, open questions, tasks, and other durable inventory records.
pull-learnings
Pulls shared organization patterns into local org-patterns.toon.
dashboard-session-abort-all
Abort multiple running sessions (asks which). Usage /dashboard:session-abort-all.
dashboard-session-tell
Send a prompt to another session. Usage /dashboard:session-tell.
dashboard-session-unhide
Unhide a previously hidden session. Usage /dashboard:session-unhide.