Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/known-issuesgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ReviewToolkits/cpython-review-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/known-issues)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/known-issues"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/reviewtoolkits/cpython-review-toolkit/known-issues.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00043 | $0.01657 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00022 | $0.00829 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00009 | $0.00331 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00166 |
Grade A, and why
known-issues scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 100 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
CPython Known-Issues Regression
data/cpython_known_bugs.tsv records crash sites previously confirmed in CPython — from the findings repos (OOM-####, TSAN-####) and the upstream tracker (gh-NNNNNN). This command runs, per catalog entry, the scanner matching that entry's category over the referenced file and reports whether the known bug is still in the tree.
It is static and drift-tolerant — it does not run repros. It answers: "of the crashes we already know about, which are still present at this checkout, which have drifted, and which look fixed?"
Scope: "$ARGUMENTS" (path or glob; default the whole project). The scope's checkout root is auto-detected — catalog paths are resolved relative to it, so a narrow scope still locates the right files.
Plugin root: <plugin_root> is the plugins/cpython-review-toolkit/ directory.
Category → scanner map
| Category | Scanner |
|---|---|
recursion |
scan_recursion_guards.py |
pyerr-clear |
scan_pyerr_clear.py |
uninit-dealloc |
scan_uninit_dealloc.py |
null-deref |
scan_null_checks.py |
refcount |
scan_refcounts.py |
tsan |
scan_ft_races.py |
init-bypass |
scan_init_bypass.py |
Every shipped category has a scanner as of v0.7 — no_scanner: 0 is the expected
result, and a non-zero count means a category was added to the catalog before its
scanner. Preserve that invariant when extending the catalog.
Workflow
-
Cross-reference:
python <plugin_root>/scripts/check_known_issues.py [scope]Optional flags:
--max-files N,--catalog <path>(override the default TSV). Record the reviewed commit (git -C <project_root> rev-parse --short HEAD) — the catalog was captured at a slightly different commit, so line drift is expected. -
Read the
catalog_results/bug_rollupblocks. Each entry gets one of:present— a finding of that category at (or within ±5 lines of) the catalog line, or — when the catalog line is unknown (0) — a finding in the named function. Still unfixed. → high confidence.line_drifted— the file still has findings of that category but not at the catalog site, and the catalog's named function is gone (renamed/removed) or was never recorded (0).nearest_linepoints at the closest finding. The bug likely just moved. → medium.absent_in_function— the catalog names a function, that function still exists in the file, and it carries no finding of the category — while the file has findings elsewhere. This is absence in that function, not drift. Drift says "still there, moved"; this says "possibly fixed here". → weak signal, not a finding.absent— the file was scanned and has no findings of that category anywhere (likely fixed or refactored).file_missing— the path no longer exists under the checkout.no_scanner— a catalog category with no entry inCATEGORY_SCANNERS; carried through for completeness, not cross-referenced. As of v0.7 every shipped category has a scanner, so this should read0.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 100 lines · 43 tokens per session scan A 351e6f71439d
known-issues is a command published in the GitHub repository ReviewToolkits/cpython-review-toolkit (10 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 43 tokens to every session and 1,657 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.