Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rex/mcp-rancher. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rex/mcp-rancher/main/.claude/commands/review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rex/mcp-rancherWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rex/mcp-rancher/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rex/mcp-rancher/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rex/mcp-rancher/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rex/mcp-rancher/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rex/mcp-rancher/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00184 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00074 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00037 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Context
- Branch: !
git branch --show-current - Status: !
git status --short - Diff summary: !
git diff --stat HEAD
Review
Spawn reviewer subagent on the current working-tree diff.
If $ARGUMENTS is set, scope the review to that path. Otherwise review
everything in git diff HEAD.
Escalate to Opus (reviewer with model: opus) if the diff touches any
of: auth code, crypto, IAM, security-sensitive paths, critical-path
performance.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 24 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A f98456ef4d92
review is a command published in the GitHub repository rex/mcp-rancher (1 stars, last pushed 25d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 184 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
refactor-clean
Refactor provided code for cleanliness, maintainability, and alignment with SOLID principles and modern best practices — no over-engineering.
audit-agents-skills
Audit quality of agents, skills, and commands in a Claude Code project.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
resolve-dependabot-prs
Triage open Dependabot PRs, return a quick risk/action summary table, then enter planning mode with an ordered rebase→merge→follow-up→resume resolution plan.
rev
Invoke Code Reviewer for code quality, security, requirements validation, and best practices review.
mlops
Invoke the MLOps Engineer for model serving & inference infrastructure, ML/AI pipelines, model deployment & monitoring, and infrastructure-level AI cost optimization.