Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rhuss/cc-spexWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rhuss/cc-spex/speckit.spex-collab.reviewers)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rhuss/cc-spex/speckit.spex-collab.reviewers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rhuss/cc-spex/speckit.spex-collab.reviewers/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rhuss/cc-spex/speckit.spex-collab.reviewers"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rhuss/cc-spex/speckit.spex-collab.reviewers.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.02299 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01149 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00460 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00230 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.spex-collab.reviewers scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 233 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Generate REVIEWERS.md Review Guide
Ship Pipeline Guard
If .specify/.spex-state exists and its mode is "ship" or status is "running", skip REVIEWERS.md generation entirely and return immediately.
if [ -f ".specify/.spex-state" ]; then
MODE=$(jq -r '.mode // empty' .specify/.spex-state 2>/dev/null)
STATUS=$(jq -r '.status // empty' .specify/.spex-state 2>/dev/null)
if [ "$MODE" = "ship" ] || [ "$STATUS" = "running" ]; then
echo "Ship mode active, skipping REVIEWERS.md generation"
fi
fi
If ship mode is detected, output nothing further and return. Do not generate or modify any files.
Extension Enabled Check
Verify spex-collab is active. If the extension directory does not exist, skip silently:
if [ ! -f ".specify/extensions/spex-collab/extension.yml" ]; then
echo "spex-collab extension not found, skipping"
fi
If the extension is not found, return without generating REVIEWERS.md. Vanilla spec-kit behavior is preserved.
Resolve Spec Directory
Run the prerequisites script to locate the feature directory:
.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --paths-only 2>/dev/null
Parse the JSON output to extract:
FEATURE_DIR: absolute path to the spec directory (e.g.,/path/to/specs/018-collab-extension)FEATURE_SPEC: path to spec.md
If resolution fails, inform the user and stop:
Cannot resolve spec directory. Are you on a feature branch?
Check for Existing REVIEWERS.md
REVIEWERS_PATH="${FEATURE_DIR}/REVIEWERS.md"
if [ -f "$REVIEWERS_PATH" ]; then
echo "REVIEWERS.md exists, checking for code phase sections to preserve"
fi
If REVIEWERS.md already exists:
- Read its content
- Look for the first line matching
## Phase [0-9](a code phase section heading) - If found: preserve everything from that line onwards (these are code phase sections from previous implementation phases). Only regenerate the spec sections above that boundary.
- If no phase headings found: regenerate the entire file
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 233 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 3ea23649a42c
speckit.spex-collab.reviewers is a command published in the GitHub repository rhuss/cc-spex (117 stars, last pushed 22d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 2,299 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.
security-review
AI-powered security review of the current git diff (or specified paths). Dispatches the security-reviewer agent and prints findings grouped by severity.