Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ric03uec/clawrium. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ric03uec/clawrium/main/.opencode/commands/itx-review-pr.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ric03uec/clawriumWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ric03uec/clawrium/itx-review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ric03uec/clawrium/itx-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ric03uec/clawrium/itx-review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ric03uec/clawrium/itx-review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ric03uec/clawrium/itx-review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.00097 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00048 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00019 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00010 |
Grade A, and why
itx-review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Request a code review for the current PR.
Steps:
- If PR number provided as $ARGUMENTS, use it
- Otherwise find PR for current branch:
gh pr view --json number - Run ATX review agents
- Fix any blocking issues
- Re-request review if needed
Review must pass (rating > 3/5, no blocking issues) before merge.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 15 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 699b84177e14
itx-review-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository ric03uec/clawrium (51 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 97 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
cli-anything-web:list
List all available CLI-Anything-Web CLIs (installed and generated).
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
review-uv-script
Review uv Python script for PEP 723 compliance and best practices.
advanced-code-review-context
Advanced Code Review Phase 2: Context Analysis - load previous reviews, PR history, declined items.
code-review-give
Give mode for code-review: Review someone else's code with multi-pass analysis and structured recommendations.
mach12:issue-review
Read a GitHub issue and all comments, review the implementation plan, and present findings.