Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flow/master/.claude/commands/corgi/human-qa.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/human-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/human-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/human-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/human-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/human-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00021 | $0.00207 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00083 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00041 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00021 |
Grade A, and why
Corgi: Human QA scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
No licence file
A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 21 tokens per session scan A d5a4e88374f2
Corgi: Human QA is a command published in the GitHub repository ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flow (104 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), with no licence file. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 207 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
qawolf-cli
Manage QA Wolf through the qawolf CLI. Use when asked to create, update, or list coverage requests, bug reports, or maintenance reports; start a run of flows or tags on the QA Wolf platform or read a run's results; list, set, or delete environment variables; manage environments, flows, or tags; run or list flows…
qawolfCliRunResults.template
How to use what qawolf run get --run-id --json returns, and how to read the Playwright trace it links to.
qa
Live-app real-user QA pass derived from the spec.
ui-aqa-flow
Workflow for automated QA: integration and end-to-end UI test automation, page objects, etc.
webapp-testing
Toolkit for interacting with and testing local web applications using Playwright. Supports verifying frontend functionality, debugging UI behavior, capturing browser screenshots, and viewing browser logs.
triage-failed-scenarios
Run the Playwright specs and triage each failing scenario — delete, update and re-record, or report as a defect.