Corgi: Lint

A read-only command that checks the health of RFC-first Memory and Wiki information, with an option to save a report. An RFC is a written proposal; a wiki is shared project documentation.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for validating Memory and Wiki health and, with --report, saving an explicit validation report.
Why use it?
It finds problems in the project's stored planning and documentation information without changing it by default.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/ricoyudog/coding_corgi_flow/lint
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flow

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 24 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 206 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00024 $0.00206
Opus 5 $0.00012 $0.00103
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00041
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00021

Measured 3d ago against content hash dba63b44c865, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

Corgi: Lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/corgi/lint.md · 30 lines

The source is not reproduced here

No licence file

A repository with no LICENSE is all rights reserved by default, so the body is not copied here. The metadata, the measurements and the link are.

Read it on GitHub

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 3d ago First seen · 30 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A dba63b44c865

Subscribe to this mod's changes

Corgi: Lint is a command published in the GitHub repository ricoyudog/Coding_Corgi_flow (104 stars, last pushed 14d ago), with no licence file. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 206 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.