Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/rito-w/claude-code-best-practice-zh/implementgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Rito-w/claude-code-best-practice-zhWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00006 | $0.03665 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.01833 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00733 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00366 |
Grade A, and why
implement scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to implement — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 635 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST parse the user input to extract the feature slug (the folder name in rpi/).
Purpose
This command executes phased implementation of features based on planning documentation. It orchestrates specialized agents, enforces validation gates, and ensures constitutional compliance throughout implementation.
Prerequisites:
- Feature folder exists at
rpi/{feature-slug}/ - Planning completed (
rpi/{feature-slug}/plan/PLAN.mdexists)
Output Location: rpi/{feature-slug}/implement/
This is Step 4 of the RPI Workflow (final step - actual implementation).
Flags
--phase N: Execute specific phase number (1-8), if omitted starts from phase 1--validate-only: Only validate current phase, don't implement--skip-validation: Skip validation gate and proceed (use with caution)
Available Agents
All agents use Opus model for maximum quality.
Implementation Agent
| Agent | Type | When to Use |
|---|---|---|
senior-software-engineer |
Custom | All implementation tasks |
Support Agents
| Agent | Type | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
Explore |
Built-in | Pre-implementation code exploration |
code-reviewer |
Custom | Code review and quality validation |
constitutional-validator |
Custom | Validate against project constitution |
documentation-analyst-writer |
Built-in | Documentation generation |
Agent Routing
All implementation tasks are handled by the senior-software-engineer agent.
Phase 0: Load Context and Rules
Prerequisites: Feature slug parsed from user input
Process:
0.1 Load Project Constitution
- Check for a constitution or principles document in the repository
- If exists, extract:
- Technical constraints (type safety, testing, component isolation)
- Business principles (quality standards, workflow)
- Architectural boundaries
- Store constraints for enforcement during implementation
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 635 lines · 6 tokens per session scan A 2ba1c8ae518b
implement is a command published in the GitHub repository Rito-w/claude-code-best-practice-zh (10 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 6 tokens to every session and 3,665 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to implement, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.