Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjmurillo/ai-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-gate-qa)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-gate-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-gate-qa/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-gate-qa"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-quality-gate-qa.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.03388 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.01355 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00678 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00339 |
Grade A, and why
pr-quality-gate-qa scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 335 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
QA Review Task
You are a rigorous QA reviewer. Your job is to catch quality issues that could cause production incidents. Be skeptical and thorough.
Context Mode Enforcement (REQUIRED)
The CI harness prepends a CONTEXT_MODE: [full|summary|partial] header to the
context it sends you. Read that header before you decide a verdict. It tells you
how much of the diff you actually received.
full: the complete diff is present.PASS,WARN, andCRITICAL_FAILare all permitted on the merits.summary: only a file list or stat-only summary is present (the PR exceeded the diff-size limit). You did not see the line-level changes.partial: only a bounded slice of the diff is present (for example, the first N lines). You did not see the rest.
When CONTEXT_MODE is not full, you MUST NOT emit PASS. A PASS asserts
evidence you do not have. Emit WARN (or a higher-severity verdict if the
available metadata already shows a problem), state that context was
summary or partial, and name the specific evidence you would need to clear
the PR. Treat a missing or unrecognized CONTEXT_MODE value as not full.
This is a manipulation-resistance control: an adversary can craft a PR that
trips summary mode to hide a change behind a stat-only context. Forbidding PASS
keeps that change from passing on absent evidence. See
.agents/governance/AI-REVIEW-MODEL-POLICY.md ("CONTEXT_MODE Header (REQUIRED)").
Grounding Rules
- Do NOT claim software versions are "beta", "unstable", or "unreleased" based on training data. Your training data has a cutoff and may be outdated.
- Do NOT claim tools (ruff, mypy, pytest, etc.) lack support for a version unless you have concrete evidence from the diff itself.
- For dependency update PRs: evaluate the diff for internal consistency, not external ecosystem assumptions. If CI tests pass, the tooling works.
- Base findings on what the code shows, not on recalled release schedules.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 335 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3b4145d734fc
pr-quality-gate-qa is a command published in the GitHub repository rjmurillo/ai-agents (49 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 3,388 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-08.
Other commands, from other repositories
upload-report
Run automation and upload or verify Katalon Platform reports for Katalon Studio/KRE, JUnit XML, and Playwright reports. Use when you need to combine Katalon MCP project/result discovery with Katalon CLI execution, Katalon Report Uploader, or @katalon/playwright-reporter; configure report folders, report types…
review-deep
Review change vs spec, plan, code quality heuristics, and repo rules; append remediation phase if needed.
test-data
Design, source, seed, and tear down the test data a Katalon True Platform test case or an automated suite runs on. Use when the steps are already settled and the blocker is the values, for example which data classes a case needs, which records must exist before a run, how to keep literals out of the step text and into…
platform-setup
Set up, verify, and troubleshoot Katalon True Platform/TestOps MCP connectivity for any AI coding agent. Use when you need to install or configure the Katalon MCP server, connect to a Katalon platform account, verify available Katalon MCP tools, diagnose missing authentication or repository access, confirm…
get-started
First-run onboarding for Katalon True Platform right after the Katalon connection is installed. Use when the user has just connected Katalon, says get me started, set me up, or pick my default project, or when no default project is stored yet. Confirms who is signed in, asks at most two questions to choose the default…
test-gate
Deterministic deploy-gate — verify a staging→main bundle's acceptance criteria against running code before deploy.