Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add rjmurillo/ai-agents/plugin install project-toolkitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rjmurillo/ai-agents/pr-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.04558 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.02279 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00912 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00456 |
Grade A, and why
pr-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 201 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
PR Review Command
ultrathink
Respond to PR review comments for: $ARGUMENTS
Load configuration from pr-review-config.yaml for scripts, completion criteria,
error recovery, and failure handling tables. In this repository the live config
sits beside the PR review command.
The bundled copy IS runnable from an installed plugin (issue #5112, Option 1).
When resolve_pr_review_config lands on a config inside a host-declared plugin
root (COPILOT_PLUGIN_ROOT or CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT) whose tree is disjoint
from the consumer's git work tree, the completion gate treats that origin as
install-trusted: the operator installed it and PR content cannot write there, so
the gate skips the byte-identity check it would otherwise run against the trusted
ref. This reverses an earlier stance that called the bundled copy a reference
artifact; under that stance an installed /pr-review could not dispatch at all,
because path containment refused the config before any check ran.
Disjoint, not merely "outside." Neither tree may be at or under the other,
and the difference is not pedantic. A root of $HOME with the repository at
$HOME/repo is "outside" the work tree in the loose sense (it is not a
subdirectory of it) while containing every file the checked-out PR wrote. That
reading was in an earlier draft of this paragraph, and the matching one-way test
in the gate admitted exactly that root, so a PR-authored config became
install-trusted and skipped verification. Both directions are checked now.
The boundary is the real work tree from git rev-parse --show-toplevel,
because a directory marker inside the repository can be created by the PR and
therefore cannot anchor trust. If the work tree cannot be established, no root
install-trusts anything and the gate exits 3.
Runtime prerequisite. The gate parses YAML, and the plugin declares no
dependencies, so a clean consumer environment may lack PyYAML. Not new (the
gate has always parsed YAML), but reachable now that an installed
/pr-review can dispatch. The failure is clean, never a criterion failure:
exit 2, PyYAML is required to parse the completion-gate config, and the
path of the interpreter that failed. Install into THAT interpreter. The
invocation below uses uv run python, so the environment is the consumer
project's and uv run --with pyyaml python ... is the form that works; a
bare pip install pyyaml can modify an environment the next run never
consults, leaving the failure unchanged.
Three limits, because the widening is narrow. The $repo_root/.claude fallback
in the list below gets NO such treatment even if a plugin-root variable points
at it: that path is written by the checked-out PR and keeps the full trust
check. Only the config ORIGIN widens; the commands the config names are still
verified against the trusted ref, so an install-trusted config cannot execute a
PR-rewritten verifier script. And --trusted-ref is validated on this path like
any other, including the requirement that it resolve to a remote-tracking ref:
HEAD and local branches can be moved by the checked-out PR, so they cannot
anchor trust and are refused.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago Changed · +1 lines f6a2bb7aad05
- 8d ago First seen · 200 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A bb039207c86a
pr-review is a command published in the GitHub repository rjmurillo/ai-agents (45 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 4,558 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdlc-ship
Phase 4 — Ship. Runs devops-engineer for CI/CD, cloud deploy, and release. Reads verify-handoff.md for clean context.
session
Complete guide to managing pair programming sessions.
reviewer
Code review using batch file analysis for comprehensive reviews.
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from airmcp-com/mcp-standards, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.