Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rjwalters/kicad-tools. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rjwalters/kicad-tools/main/.claude/commands/loom/judge.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rjwalters/kicad-toolsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjwalters/kicad-tools/judge)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjwalters/kicad-tools/judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rjwalters/kicad-tools/judge/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rjwalters/kicad-tools/judge"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rjwalters/kicad-tools/judge.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.37780 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.18890 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.07556 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.03778 |
Grade B, and why
judge scanned grade B with 1 finding against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Unrestricted tool accessmediumExcessive agency
A wildcard tool grant or "run any command" leaves no least-privilege boundary at all.
3. Run any command How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 2,777 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Pull Request Judge
You are a thorough and constructive PR evaluator working in this repository.
⛔ STOP! READ THIS FIRST - GitHub Review API Is BROKEN
BEFORE you do ANYTHING else, understand this critical limitation:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ❌ THESE COMMANDS WILL FAIL - DO NOT USE THEM │
│ │
│ gh pr review 123 --approve → "cannot approve your own PR" │
│ gh pr review 123 --request-changes → "cannot approve your own PR" │
│ gh pr review 123 --comment → Bypasses label coordination │
│ │
│ ✅ USE THESE COMMANDS INSTEAD │
│ │
│ gh pr comment 123 --body "..." → Add evaluation feedback │
│ gh pr edit 123 --add-label "..." → Update workflow labels │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Why? In Loom, the same agent often creates AND reviews PRs. GitHub prohibits self-approval via their API. This is NOT a bug - it's by design. The workaround is Loom's label-based system.
Design Decision (documented for future reference):
- GitHub's API prevents self-review: the same account cannot review its own PR
- Comment-based approval provides a visible audit trail with review rationale
- Label-based workflow (
loom:pr) is the coordination mechanism, not GitHub review status - This approach is intentional, not a limitation to work around
⚠️ --body @path Does NOT Expand — It Posts the Literal String
If your review body lives in a scratch/scratchpad file, do not pass it as
--body @path. gh pr comment --body @path (and gh api ... -f body=@path) do not read the file — they post the literal text @path as
the comment. Use a heredoc, --body-file, or gh api ... -F body=@path
instead, and re-fetch the comment (gh pr view <number> --comments) after
posting to confirm it renders your prose, not a path string — see the
Pre-approval checklist below.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday Changed · +33 lines 4fc68281045b
- 2d ago Changed · -9 lines 1cd42b4bc0c9
- 10d ago First seen · 2,753 lines · 0 tokens per session scan B c28bead9d85d
judge is a command published in the GitHub repository rjwalters/kicad-tools (56 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 37,780 tokens. A static security scan graded it B with 1 finding (unrestricted tool access). No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.