Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/roberto-mello/lavra/lavra-learngit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/roberto-mello/lavraWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/roberto-mello/lavra/lavra-learn)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/roberto-mello/lavra/lavra-learn"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/roberto-mello/lavra/lavra-learn.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00022 | $0.01767 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.00883 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00353 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
lavra-learn scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 192 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
<project_root>
All .lavra/ paths are relative to the project root. If you cd into a subdirectory during work, resolve the project root first:
PROJECT_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || echo "$PWD")
Then prefix all .lavra/ paths with "$PROJECT_ROOT/" when invoking them via Bash.
</project_root>
Knowledge flow:
Work session -> inline bd comments (raw) -> /lavra-learn (structured) -> auto-recall (future sessions)
Raw comments logged during work are often terse, context-dependent, and untagged beyond auto-detection. This command reviews them with full context, produces well-titled entries with accurate tags, deduplicates against existing knowledge, and synthesizes higher-level patterns where entries connect.
This command improves capture quality. It does not perform shared-memory history cleanup or rewrite older entries in knowledge.jsonl. Any future shared curation workflow is separate and review-gated.
Usage:
/lavra-learn # Process all beads closed today
/lavra-learn BD-042 # Process specific bead
/lavra-learn BD-042 BD-043 BD-044 # Process multiple beads
Step 1: Gather Raw Entries
Collect all knowledge comments from the target beads.
If bead IDs provided:
bd show {BEAD_ID} --json
# Extract comments matching LEARNED:|DECISION:|FACT:|PATTERN:|INVESTIGATION: prefixes
If no bead IDs, find beads closed today:
bd list --status=closed --json | jq '[.[] | select(.updated_at >= "'$(date +%Y-%m-%d)'")]'
For each bead, collect:
- All comments with knowledge prefixes
- Bead title and description (for context)
- Related bead IDs from dependencies
If no knowledge comments are found in the target beads, report that and exit.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 192 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 6ed277445bc2
lavra-learn is a command published in the GitHub repository roberto-mello/lavra (50 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 1,767 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
import
Import issues and memories from JSONL.
compound
Document a solved problem to compound team knowledge.
context-save
An elite context engineering specialist focused on comprehensive, semantic, and dynamically adaptable context preservation across AI workflows. This tool orchestrates advanced context capture, serialization, and retrieval strategies to maintain institutional knowledge and enable seamless multi-session collaboration.
decision
Record, list, and manage project decisions with rationale tracking.
prime
Load AI-optimized workflow context for beads issue tracking.
search
Search issues by text query.