Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-CreatorWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/review-epo-formalities)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/review-epo-formalities"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/review-epo-formalities/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/review-epo-formalities"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/robthepcguy/claude-patent-creator/review-epo-formalities.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00023 | $0.01767 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00883 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00353 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
review-epo-formalities scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- review-epo-formalities — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 225 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
EPO Formalities Check
Verify all formal requirements for a European patent application under EPC Rules 42-49.
Check Type: $ARGUMENTS
What I'll Check
- Description (Rule 42 EPC) - Required sections, disclosure sufficiency, unity
- Claims (Rule 43 EPC) - Two-part form, numbering, fees for excess claims
- Abstract (Rule 47 EPC) - Max 150 words, single figure designation, content
- Drawings (Rule 46 EPC) - Technical quality, reference signs, margins
- Request for Grant (Rule 41 EPC) - Form 1001, designation of states, priorities
- Translation Requirements - Language of proceedings (Rule 6 EPC)
- Fees - Filing fee, search fee, designation fee, claims fee (> 15 claims)
Specified check type focuses on that requirement; otherwise checks everything.
Process
- Ask for application sections (or read from file)
- Check each EPO formality requirement
- Search EPC rules and EPO Guidelines for standards
- Generate compliance report with:
- Requirements checklist per rule
- Non-compliance issues
- Fix instructions with rule citations
- Pre-filing checklist for EPO
EPO-Specific Requirements
Description (Rule 42 EPC)
Required sections in order:
- Title of the invention
- Technical field
- Background art (with citation of prior art documents)
- Disclosure of the invention (technical problem and solution)
- Brief description of drawings (if any)
- Detailed description of at least one embodiment
- Industrial applicability (if not obvious)
Claims (Rule 43 EPC)
- Two-part form for independent claims (preamble + "characterised in that")
- Clear reference to description and drawings
- No drawings or graphs in claims
- Numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals
- Fee applies for each claim beyond 15 (Rule 45 EPC)
- Fee applies for each claim beyond 50
Abstract (Rule 47 EPC)
- Maximum 150 words
- Must indicate technical field
- Must include concise summary of disclosure
- Must designate most illustrative figure (if drawings exist)
- No commercial statements
- Single paragraph preferred
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 225 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 5960e4088721
review-epo-formalities is a command published in the GitHub repository RobThePCGuy/Claude-Patent-Creator (180 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 1,767 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
setup-video-vision
Interactive setup wizard for claude-video-vision — configure backend, whisper, frames, and verify dependencies.
coding-audit
Medical-coding / revenue-cycle compliance audit. Invokes rcm-reviewer to assess autonomous ICD-10-CM / CPT / HCPCS coding for False Claims Act exposure (upcoding/unbundling), NCCI edits + MUEs, medical necessity (LCD/NCD), modifier discipline, HIPAA minimum-necessary — and force a certified-coder (CPC/CCS) sign-off.
tax-review
Tax-filing compliance check — invokes tax-reviewer to produce TM-tax-{slug}.md with MeF e-file schema, Form 8879, PTIN/Circular 230, and IRC §7216 consent gaps.
search-flights
Search award flight availability across airlines.
overlay-apply
Apply NIST 800-53 overlays (FedRAMP, DoD, Privacy, etc.) to existing baselines.
pillar-guidance
Deep dive guidance on DORA's 5 pillars and implementation requirements.