Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add robzilla1738/roberts-skills/plugin install bughunt-suiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/robzilla1738/roberts-skills/bughunt-cursor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/robzilla1738/roberts-skills/bughunt-cursor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/robzilla1738/roberts-skills/bughunt-cursor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/robzilla1738/roberts-skills/bughunt-cursor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/robzilla1738/roberts-skills/bughunt-cursor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00038 | $0.00835 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00417 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00167 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00084 |
Grade A, and why
bughunt-cursor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run a fast bug hunt against: $ARGUMENTS
Same hunt, faster substrate: the (lens × hotspot) grid is fanned out by the Cursor CLI
(cursor-agent) on a fast model (Composer 2.5 / Grok) instead of the Workflow tool, while the
mandatory skeptic pass stays on a strong reasoner (Opus 4.8). This is Rung A-CLI of the
capability ladder — usable inside Cursor, Claude Code, or any shell with cursor-agent on PATH.
Load and follow the bughunt skill at ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bughunt/SKILL.md exactly,
selecting the Rung A-CLI path in orchestration.md.
Parse $ARGUMENTS for scope (diff · staged · a path · a module · empty = whole repo),
depth (quick · deep, default deep), and an optional hunt-model id (default
composer-2.5; discover ids with cursor-agent --list-models).
Then run the loop:
- Preflight — confirm
cursor-agentis on PATH (cursor-agent --version) and auth is set (CURSOR_API_KEYor a priorcursor-agent login). If it is not available, fall back to the standard/bughuntrungs (Workflow / Tasks / sequential) and say so. - Recon & pre-pass — detect platform, map trust boundaries, and run the deterministic
pre-pass:
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bughunt/scripts/bughunt.py census,hotspots,signals,deps(see tooling.md). On a large/unfamiliar repo, confirm scope first. - Build the grid — form
cells: [{ lens, platform, area, files, lensPath, platformPath }](absolute spoke paths under${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bughunt/) and writecells.json. - Hunt + Verify (one command) —
Hunters are read-only (node ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bughunt/scripts/hunt-cursor.mjs \ --cells cells.json --workspace "$PWD" \ --hunt-model composer-2.5 --verify-model claude-opus-4-8-thinking-high \ | python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bughunt/scripts/bughunt.py merge - \ --require-verified --require-coverage --strict --write-baseline--mode ask, never--force). Keep the verify model strong — do not move the skeptic pass to the fast model. - Report —
python3 ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bughunt/scripts/bughunt.py render .bughunt/findings.jsonemits ranked markdown (+ HTML + SARIF) into.bughunt/.
This is report-only: surface and prove bugs, do not edit code unless I ask. To then prove high-value Probable findings at runtime in parallel sandboxes, see the optional Confirm rung in confirm.md. If $ARGUMENTS is empty, ask what to hunt and which depth.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 48 lines · 38 tokens per session scan A 5741243f288f
bughunt-cursor is a command published in the GitHub repository robzilla1738/roberts-skills (5 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 38 tokens to every session and 835 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
fix-issues
Diagnose, reproduce, then fix reproducible open GitHub issues in parallel: one clean worktree/issue; symlink build artifacts to avoid rebuilds.
maintainer-review-error-handling
Review the PR for error-handling correctness — surfaced errors, no silent swallows, consistent error patterns (Pi-tuned).
investigate
Establish the proven causal chain for the target — from the observed symptom to the root cause that actually explains it — and write a report a fixer or planner can act on without repeating your work. You change nothing and fix nothing: the repository must be exactly as you found it when you finish. No one watches the…
review-errors
Find one defect: a real failure crosses the changed code and becomes indistinguishable from success to the caller, operator, or user who must react. Not every error needs logging; recovery is correct when the contract permits it and the right owner can still observe the outcome. Read-only: never modify files, commit…
error-flow
Design an error flow end to end — prevention, detection, messaging, and recovery paths.
ux-fix
Opt-in fix loop. Reads the latest report from .ux/, validates working tree, and applies findings as atomic commits via the right sub-agents. Triggers on "fix the findings", "apply the fixes", or "run the fix loop". Use when applying findings from a previous audit / copy / a11y / motion / polish report, the user says…