favorites

favorites is a command for Claude Code from rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp. It costs 14 tokens per session (319 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A WhatsApp contact-selection command that suggests people from recent two-way conversations for the user's Favorites list.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing suggested contacts, accepting, rejecting, or postponing each choice, and recording the user's decisions.
Why use it?
It lets the user build the list from real conversation activity without automatically deciding who should be included.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the whatsapp-mcp plugin — 7 commands shipped together

Good fit It is for reviewing suggested contacts, accepting, rejecting, or postponing each choice, and recording the user's decisions.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp/favorites
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install whatsapp-mcp, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 7 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for favorites

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp/favorites/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp/favorites)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp/favorites"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp/favorites/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for favorites

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp/favorites"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp/favorites.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 14 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 319 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00014 $0.00319
Opus 5.5 $0.00006 $0.00128
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00003 $0.00064
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00032

Measured 5d ago against content hash 47f0ac42612a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

favorites scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/favorites.md · 28 lines

What it actually says

Help the user build the list of favorites that comes first in their summaries. A favorite is the WhatsApp Favorites list; if it is empty (or incomplete), suggest names from how the user actually talks. You only propose: every name becomes a favorite by the user's own decision. Nothing leaves this machine and no message is sent.

1. Look at what exists

Call list_favorites (an empty list is normal) and show it.

2. Suggest

Call suggest_favorites. It returns one-to-one chats of the last month with real two-way traffic (someone who only writes to the user, like a shop or a promotion, is never proposed), with how many messages came from each side. Show one table: name, messages from them, messages from the user.

3. Decide, one name at a time

Ask the user about each suggested name: keep as favorite, not a favorite, or skip for now. Record only what they answer with decide_favorite:

  • accept: becomes a favorite.
  • reject: never suggested again.
  • remove: forget an earlier decision.

Do not decide for the user, not even for names that look obvious. A name they skip is not recorded.

4. Finish

Call list_favorites and show the result. Tell them they can also mark favorites in WhatsApp itself: that list is read by the bridge when WhatsApp syncs it.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 5d ago First seen · 28 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 47f0ac42612a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

favorites is a command published in the GitHub repository rodrigopg/whatsapp-mcp (4 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 319 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-12.