learn-eval

A command that finds reusable lessons in a coding session, checks their quality, and decides whether to save them for one project or for general use.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it after solving errors, finding workarounds, or learning project-specific patterns to draft a reusable skill file.
Why use it?
It helps preserve useful debugging discoveries without saving vague or low-value advice in the wrong place.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/rohitbind123/claude-setup/learn-eval
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RohitBind123/claude-setup
Per session 25 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 794 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00025 $0.00794
Opus 5 $0.00013 $0.00397
Sonnet 5 $0.00005 $0.00159
Haiku 4.5 $0.00003 $0.00079

Measured 2d ago against content hash 653fbeefd217, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

learn-eval scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to learn-eval — 1 line differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

commands/learn-eval.md · 92 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 92 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/learn-eval - Extract, Evaluate, then Save

Extends /learn with a quality gate and save-location decision before writing any skill file.

What to Extract

Look for:

  1. Error Resolution Patterns — root cause + fix + reusability
  2. Debugging Techniques — non-obvious steps, tool combinations
  3. Workarounds — library quirks, API limitations, version-specific fixes
  4. Project-Specific Patterns — conventions, architecture decisions, integration patterns

Process

  1. Review the session for extractable patterns

  2. Identify the most valuable/reusable insight

  3. Determine save location:

    • Ask: "Would this pattern be useful in a different project?"
    • Global (~/.claude/skills/learned/): Generic patterns usable across 2+ projects (bash compatibility, LLM API behavior, debugging techniques, etc.)
    • Project (.claude/skills/learned/ in current project): Project-specific knowledge (quirks of a particular config file, project-specific architecture decisions, etc.)
    • When in doubt, choose Global (moving Global → Project is easier than the reverse)
  4. Draft the skill file using this format:

---
name: pattern-name
description: "Under 130 characters"
user-invocable: false
origin: auto-extracted
---

# [Descriptive Pattern Name]

**Extracted:** [Date]
**Context:** [Brief description of when this applies]

## Problem
[What problem this solves - be specific]

## Solution
[The pattern/technique/workaround - with code examples]

## When to Use
[Trigger conditions]
  1. Self-evaluate before saving using this rubric:

    Dimension 1 3 5
    Specificity Abstract principles only, no code examples Representative code example present Rich examples covering all usage patterns
    Actionability Unclear what to do Main steps are understandable Immediately actionable, edge cases covered
    Scope Fit Too broad or too narrow Mostly appropriate, some boundary ambiguity Name, trigger, and content perfectly aligned
    Non-redundancy Nearly identical to another skill Some overlap but unique perspective exists Completely unique value
    Coverage Covers only a fraction of the target task Main cases covered, common variants missing Main cases, edge cases, and pitfalls covered

Read the full file on GitHub · 92 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 92 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A 653fbeefd217

Subscribe to this mod's changes

learn-eval is a command published in the GitHub repository RohitBind123/claude-setup (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 794 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to learn-eval, differing in 1 line, and is treated as a copy.