Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/rohitbind123/claude-setup/multi-executegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/RohitBind123/claude-setupWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.02528 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.01264 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00506 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00253 |
Grade A, and why
multi-execute scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 311 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Execute - Multi-Model Collaborative Execution
Multi-model collaborative execution - Get prototype from plan → Claude refactors and implements → Multi-model audit and delivery.
$ARGUMENTS
Core Protocols
- Language Protocol: Use English when interacting with tools/models, communicate with user in their language
- Code Sovereignty: External models have zero filesystem write access, all modifications by Claude
- Dirty Prototype Refactoring: Treat Codex/Gemini Unified Diff as "dirty prototype", must refactor to production-grade code
- Stop-Loss Mechanism: Do not proceed to next phase until current phase output is validated
- Prerequisite: Only execute after user explicitly replies "Y" to
/ccg:planoutput (if missing, must confirm first)
Multi-Model Call Specification
Call Syntax (parallel: use run_in_background: true):
# Resume session call (recommended) - Implementation Prototype
Bash({
command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}}--backend <codex|gemini> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}resume <SESSION_ID> - \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Requirement: <task description>
Context: <plan content + target files>
</TASK>
OUTPUT: Unified Diff Patch ONLY. Strictly prohibit any actual modifications.
EOF",
run_in_background: true,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
# New session call - Implementation Prototype
Bash({
command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}}--backend <codex|gemini> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}- \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Requirement: <task description>
Context: <plan content + target files>
</TASK>
OUTPUT: Unified Diff Patch ONLY. Strictly prohibit any actual modifications.
EOF",
run_in_background: true,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
Audit Call Syntax (Code Review / Audit):
Bash({
command: "~/.claude/bin/codeagent-wrapper {{LITE_MODE_FLAG}}--backend <codex|gemini> {{GEMINI_MODEL_FLAG}}resume <SESSION_ID> - \"$PWD\" <<'EOF'
ROLE_FILE: <role prompt path>
<TASK>
Scope: Audit the final code changes.
Inputs:
- The applied patch (git diff / final unified diff)
- The touched files (relevant excerpts if needed)
Constraints:
- Do NOT modify any files.
- Do NOT output tool commands that assume filesystem access.
</TASK>
OUTPUT:
1) A prioritized list of issues (severity, file, rationale)
2) Concrete fixes; if code changes are needed, include a Unified Diff Patch in a fenced code block.
EOF",
run_in_background: true,
timeout: 3600000,
description: "Brief description"
})
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 311 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c67edcd57669
multi-execute is a command published in the GitHub repository RohitBind123/claude-setup (2 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 2,528 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.