report-cost

report-cost is a command for Claude Code from rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit. It costs 0 tokens per session (140 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A development cost report that organizes spending by category and time period, then summarizes trends and possible savings.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review developer, infrastructure, tooling, and service costs and prepare charts or summaries for stakeholders.
Why use it?
It helps explain where project money is going and makes cost increases easier to spot.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin.

Part of the finance-tracker plugin — 2 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to review developer, infrastructure, tooling, and service costs and prepare charts or summaries for stakeholders.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit/report-cost
About the project

Awesome Claude Code Toolkit is a curated collection of extensions and configuration for Claude Code, including agents, skills, commands, plugins, hooks, rules, templates, MCP configurations, and companion apps. It is for Claude Code users who want ready-made workflows and integrations for different development tasks. The catalogue add-ons are selected components from this toolkit.

rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit · 2,726 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install finance-tracker, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 2 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for report-cost

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit/report-cost/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit/report-cost)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit/report-cost"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit/report-cost/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for report-cost

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit/report-cost"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit/report-cost.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 140 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00140
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00056
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00028
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00014

Measured 1mo ago against content hash d1aebf3b141b, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

report-cost scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/finance-tracker/commands/report-cost.md · 31 lines

What it actually says

Generate a development cost report with breakdowns, trends, and optimization recommendations.

Steps

  1. Gather cost data from all sources:
  2. Create cost breakdowns:
  3. Analyze cost trends:
  4. Calculate key metrics:
  5. Identify optimization opportunities:
  6. Provide recommendations ranked by savings potential.
  7. Generate visual charts for stakeholder presentation.

Format

Cost Report: <period>
Total Spend: $<amount>
Top Categories:
  1. <category>: $<amount> (<percentage>%)

Rules

  • Use consistent currency and time periods for all comparisons.
  • Include both absolute costs and percentage breakdowns.
  • Separate fixed costs from variable costs.
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 31 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A d1aebf3b141b

Subscribe to this mod's changes

report-cost is a command published in the GitHub repository rohitg00/awesome-claude-code-toolkit (2,726 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 140 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.