Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suiteWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/audit)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite/audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00487 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00195 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 73 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
System Audit Command
Perform comprehensive system audit and compliance check with detailed reporting and recommendations.
Context
- Audit type: $1 (security|compliance|performance|all - default: all)
- Compliance framework: $2 (GDPR|HIPAA|SOC2|ISO27001|PCI-DSS - default: SOC2)
- System configuration: @config/
- Security policies: @security-policies/
Audit Process
1. Security Audit
- Vulnerability assessment and penetration testing
- Access control and authentication review
- Data protection and encryption validation
- Network security and firewall configuration
- Incident response and monitoring capabilities
2. Compliance Assessment
- Regulatory compliance validation
- Policy adherence verification
- Documentation and evidence collection
- Gap analysis and remediation planning
- Risk assessment and mitigation strategies
3. Performance Audit
- System performance and scalability analysis
- Resource utilization and efficiency review
- Capacity planning and optimization opportunities
- Monitoring and alerting effectiveness
- Disaster recovery and business continuity
4. Operational Audit
- Process documentation and standardization
- Change management and version control
- Backup and recovery procedures
- Training and knowledge management
- Vendor and third-party risk assessment
Compliance Frameworks
- GDPR: Data privacy and protection compliance
- HIPAA: Healthcare data security requirements
- SOC 2: Security, availability, and confidentiality
- ISO 27001: Information security management
- PCI DSS: Payment card industry security standards
Expected Outcome
- Comprehensive audit report with findings
- Compliance status and gap analysis
- Risk assessment and prioritization
- Remediation roadmap and timeline
- Evidence documentation and artifacts
Audit Findings
- Critical: Immediate action required
- High: Address within 30 days
- Medium: Address within 90 days
- Low: Address within 6 months
- Informational: Best practice recommendations
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 73 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A bfe8b429371a
audit is a command published in the GitHub repository rohittcodes/claude-plugin-suite (29 stars, last pushed 11mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 487 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-21.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.
compliance-audit
Full regulatory compliance audit for GDPR, HIPAA, SOC2, PCI-DSS, ISO 27001, and other frameworks with gap analysis, remediation planning, and evidence collection.