Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zhWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/time-orchestrator)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/time-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/time-orchestrator/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/time-orchestrator"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh/time-orchestrator.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00571 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00285 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00114 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
time-orchestrator scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
时间编排器命令
获取迪拜（Asia/Dubai，UTC+4）的当前时间并创建视觉SVG时间卡片。
工作流
步骤 1：获取当前迪拜时间
使用代理工具调用时间代理：
- subagent_type: time-agent
- description: 获取当前迪拜时间
- prompt: 获取迪拜（Asia/Dubai，UTC+4）的当前时间。准确返回三个字段：
time（时间部分，例如 "14:30:45"）、timezone（"GST (UTC+4)"）和formatted（完整格式化字符串，例如 "2026-03-12 14:30:45 +04"）。代理有一个预加载的技能（time-fetcher）提供详细说明。 - model: haiku
等待代理完成并捕获返回的时间数据。
数据契约
time-agent 必须返回这三个字段：
- time: 时间部分（例如，"14:30:45"）
- timezone: "GST (UTC+4)"
- formatted: 完整格式化字符串（例如，"2026-03-12 14:30:45 +04"）
步骤 2：创建 SVG 时间卡片
使用技能工具调用 time-svg-creator 技能：
- skill: time-svg-creator
- args: 传递步骤 1 的时间数据 — 包括
time、timezone和formatted值
技能将使用步骤 1 的时间数据（在当前上下文中可用）来创建SVG卡片并写入输出文件。
关键要求
- 对 time-agent 使用代理工具：不要使用 bash 命令调用代理。你必须使用带有
subagent_type: "time-agent"的代理工具。 - 对 SVG 创建器使用技能工具：通过带有
skill: "time-svg-creator"的技能工具调用SVG创建器，而不是代理工具。 - 顺序流程：代理必须在调用技能之前完成并返回时间数据。不要并行运行它们。
- 数据传递：确保代理响应中的所有三个字段（time, timezone, formatted）在调用技能时在上下文中可用。
输出摘要
在两个步骤完成后，向用户提供清晰的摘要，显示：
- 获取的当前迪拜时间
- 时区：GST (UTC+4)
- 完整格式化时间戳
- SVG 卡片创建于
agent-teams/output/dubai-time.svg - 摘要写入
agent-teams/output/output.md
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 51 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 134242f8f1f1
time-orchestrator is a command published in the GitHub repository rongxinzy/claude-code-best-practice-zh (6 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 571 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.