Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ronronner02/codepilot-agentWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/spec-doc-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/spec-doc-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/spec-doc-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/spec-doc-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ronronner02/codepilot-agent/spec-doc-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00008 | $0.05900 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.02360 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.01180 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00590 |
Grade A, and why
spec-doc-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 197 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Command support root: .claude/spec-first/workflows/spec-doc-review. Treat it as the loaded skill directory whenever this inlined workflow refers to SKILL_DIR or the directory containing SKILL.md.
Document Review
Review requirements or plan documents through multi-persona analysis. Task packs are reviewed as derived, report-only execution inputs against their current source plan. Dispatches generic subagents seeded with skill-local reviewer prompt assets, applies safe_auto fixes only when the run-local mutation policy is markdown-write, and preserves the same structural/semantic review as report-only findings when mutation is unavailable or forbidden.
Workflow Contract Summary
- 输入： requirements、统一计划、legacy plan、task pack 或其他可读 spec artifact，及可选 roster/output/mutation 参数。
- 输出： 默认 report-only 的结构化文档 findings、coverage、改进建议与可选 JSON envelope；只有显式 apply 授权才可修改 Markdown。
- 硬出口： 文档不可读、flag 冲突、task-pack/source-plan 漂移、format/source owner 不明确，或 mutation authority 缺失时不得写入文档。
- 权威： 原文和 source refs 提供事实，persona/LLM 判断语义充分性；producer 拥有 derived artifact 修复，review 不继承 commit/landing authority。
- 消费者： 文档 owner、
spec-brainstorm、spec-plan、spec-write-tasks、spec-work与人工 reviewer。
Interactive mode rules
- Pre-load the platform question tool before any question fires. In Claude Code,
AskUserQuestionis deferred — callToolSearchwithselect:AskUserQuestiononce, eagerly, at the top of Interactive-mode work (before the routing question, walk-through, bulk-preview, and Phase 5 terminal question) rather than at the first question site. Other hosts don't need this preload. - The numbered-list fallback applies only when the harness genuinely lacks a blocking question tool (
ToolSearchno match, the call fails, or the mode doesn't expose it, e.g. Codex edit modes). A pending schema load is not a fallback trigger. In genuine-fallback cases present options as a numbered list and wait. Rendering a question as narrative text because the tool feels inconvenient, the model is mid-report, or the instruction was buried is a bug — a question that calls for a user decision must either fire the tool or fall back loudly, never slip past as prose.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 197 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A a61fea6beeb2
spec-doc-review is a command published in the GitHub repository ronronner02/codepilot-agent (0 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 5,900 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
debate
Run adversarial debate to stress-test and improve a document.
brainstorm
Run diverge-challenge-synthesize ideation on a topic or document.
Hexagonal.Gatekeeper
Your role is to perform a deep, architecture-focused code review on a specific branch. You must validate that all changes strictly follow Hexagonal Architecture (Ports & Adapters) principles and align with the existing codebase patterns.
assess
Run an AI literacy assessment — scan the repo for evidence, score three disciplines, produce a timestamped report.
design-review
Compare design (Figma URL or mockup image) against implementation to detect UI mismatches (colors, layout, typography).
council-sweep
Walk the configured watch paths and run Council on every artifact modified in the last N hours (default 24h).