Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rossumai/rossum-agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rossumai/rossum-agents/master/.claude/commands/ds-review-chlog.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rossumai/rossum-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-chlog)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-chlog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-chlog/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-chlog"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-review-chlog.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00422 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00169 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00084 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00042 |
Grade A, and why
ds-review-chlog scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review Changelog Completeness
Goal: Review a changelog for completeness, ensuring major changes are documented while avoiding excessive detail on minor items.
Scope
| Context | What to Review |
|---|---|
| No argument | Ask user which changelog to review |
| Path provided | Review specified changelog file |
Valid Packages
| Package | Changelog Path |
|---|---|
| rossum-mcp | rossum-mcp/CHANGELOG.md |
| rossum-agent | rossum-agent/CHANGELOG.md |
| rossum-agent-client | rossum-agent-client/CHANGELOG.md |
Change Categories
| Should Document | Can Omit |
|---|---|
| New features or capabilities | Code refactoring without behavior changes |
| Breaking changes or API modifications | Internal tooling updates |
| Significant bug fixes affecting users | Minor typo fixes |
| Security updates | Test additions/modifications |
| Dependency upgrades with notable impact | Documentation formatting |
| Performance improvements | Dependency version bumps (patch level) |
| Configuration changes |
Approach
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Identify | Ask user for changelog path if not provided |
| Read | Load changelog and pyproject.toml |
| Analyze | Check git history since last changelog entry (or last tag, or 30 days) |
| Compare | Match commits against documented changes |
| Version check | Verify changelog version matches pyproject.toml |
| Report | List gaps and suggestions |
Output
Provide a structured summary:
## Changelog Review
### Missing entries
- [ ] Major change X not documented
### Excessive detail
- [ ] Minor item Y could be removed
### Wording improvements
- [ ] Entry Z is unclear
### Version check
- [x] Changelog version matches pyproject.toml
Constraints
- No automatic file modifications
- Use
AskUserQuestionif changelog path not provided - Focus on user-facing changes, not internal refactors
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 68 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A f7358fc08320
ds-review-chlog is a command published in the GitHub repository rossumai/rossum-agents (11 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 422 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
land
Resolve and squash merge one named, currently authorized pull request.
quality
A command for temporarily clearing a release quality gate or one named check, while recording the reason and expiry time. A quality gate is a required check that normally blocks completion or release.
release-notes
Generate consistent, well-structured release notes from git history. Triggered on release tags following semver patterns (v..) to produce categorized changelog with breaking changes, features, fixes, and contributor attribution.
release-manager
Automated release coordination and deployment with ruv-swarm orchestration for seamless version management, testing, and deployment across multiple packages.
release-plan
A release-planning command for a software change. It documents the release scope, rollback plan, gradual or full rollout, and monitoring before waiting for human approval.
create-pr
Push the current branch and open a pull request into main with a structured description derived from the branch's commits and the open issues it resolves.