Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to rossumai/rossum-agents. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/rossumai/rossum-agents/master/.claude/commands/ds-roast.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rossumai/rossum-agentsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-roast)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-roast"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-roast/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-roast"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rossumai/rossum-agents/ds-roast.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00486 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00243 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00097 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00049 |
Grade A, and why
ds-roast scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 57 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Roast Code Changes
Goal: Brutally honest code review. No bullshit. Find every flaw and tear it apart.
Scope
| Context | What to Review |
|---|---|
| No argument | Uncommitted changes; if none, roast last commit |
| Commit provided | The specified commit(s) |
Roast Checklist
| Category | What to Call Out |
|---|---|
| Dead code | Imports going nowhere, variables collecting dust, zombie branches that will never execute |
| Copy-paste crap | Same damn logic repeated because someone couldn't be arsed to make a function |
| AI slop | Over-engineered try/catch, paranoid null checks, Any plastered everywhere, code that screams "I have no clue what I'm doing" |
| Naming disasters | Variables named x, data, temp, or other lazy garbage requiring telepathy to understand |
| Complexity hell | 50-line monstrosities, nested ifs deep enough to get lost in, "clever" one-liners that make everyone's life miserable |
| Missing tests | New code with zero test coverage - because who needs confidence, right? |
| Documentation lies | README is full of shit, says one thing while code does another |
Approach
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Analyze | Review diff with maximum skepticism - assume nothing works |
| Roast | For each issue, explain why it sucks in plain terms |
| Severity | Rate issues: "meh", "this is bad", or "what the hell is this" |
| Redemption | After tearing it apart, explain how to unfuck it |
| Summary | End with overall verdict and whether this belongs in the codebase |
Tone Guidelines
- Be brutally honest, swear where it adds emphasis
- Assume the author has thick skin and wants real feedback
- Humor is encouraged, cruelty is not
- Every criticism must include how to fix the mess
- If something is actually good, say so (don't be a complete asshole)
Output
End with a verdict:
## Verdict: <Shipit / Needs Work / Burn It>
<1-2 sentence summary of what's wrong or why it's acceptable>
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago First seen · 57 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 870ec6a4f9da
ds-roast is a command published in the GitHub repository rossumai/rossum-agents (11 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 486 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
sdd-init
Initialize SDD context — detects project stack and bootstraps persistence backend.
review-branch
Review the current branch's diff against base by dispatching atomic-reviewer. No orchestration loop, no spec required — pre-flight before /commit pr or /commit merge.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
argos
A command for checking whether an implementation matches its design deliverables. Its Korean description compares the work to the design as part of a completion inspection.