Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rosudrag/ai-praxisWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rosudrag/ai-praxis/verify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rosudrag/ai-praxis/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rosudrag/ai-praxis/verify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rosudrag/ai-praxis/verify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rosudrag/ai-praxis/verify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00514 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00206 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00103 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
Grade A, and why
verify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 86 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/verify - Pre-PR Verification
Run a comprehensive verification loop before creating a PR or committing.
Instructions
Execute each verification phase in order. Stop at the first failure and fix it before continuing.
Phase 1: Build
{{build_command}}
If fails: Fix build errors before proceeding. Do not skip.
Phase 2: Type Check (if applicable)
{{typecheck_command}}
If fails: Fix type errors. Do not use any, @ts-ignore, or # type: ignore to suppress.
Phase 3: Lint
{{lint_command}}
If fails: Fix lint violations. Auto-fix where possible, manual fix where needed.
Phase 4: Test Suite
{{test_command}}
If fails: Fix failing tests. If a test is legitimately wrong (testing old behavior), update it with a comment explaining why.
Phase 5: Security Scan
Check for common security issues in changed files:
- Hardcoded secrets (API keys, passwords, tokens)
- SQL injection vulnerabilities
- Unvalidated user input at system boundaries
- Exposed sensitive data in logs or error messages
Phase 6: Diff Review
git diff --stat
git diff
Review the full diff for:
- Debug statements (console.log, print, debugger)
- Commented-out code
- TODO/FIXME without issue references
- Files that shouldn't be committed (.env, credentials, binaries)
- Unintended changes (formatting-only diffs, unrelated modifications)
Output
## Verification Report
| Phase | Status | Details |
|-------|--------|---------|
| Build | PASS/FAIL | [details if failed] |
| Types | PASS/FAIL/SKIP | [details] |
| Lint | PASS/FAIL | [details] |
| Tests | PASS/FAIL | [X passed, Y failed] |
| Security | PASS/WARN | [findings] |
| Diff Review | PASS/WARN | [findings] |
**Result**: READY / NOT READY
Constraints
- Run ALL phases, even if early ones pass
- Do not suppress warnings to make things pass
- Fix issues inline rather than creating follow-up tasks
- If a fix would be too large, flag it and explain why
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 86 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 103202b85be3
verify is a command published in the GitHub repository rosudrag/ai-praxis (2 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 514 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
verify compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| verifyrosudrag/ai-praxis | Command | 2 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |