Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/rshade/finfocus/speckit.statusgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rshade/finfocusWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rshade/finfocus/speckit.status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rshade/finfocus/speckit.status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rshade/finfocus/speckit.status.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00022 | $0.02376 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00011 | $0.01188 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00475 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00238 |
Grade A, and why
speckit.status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to speckit.status.check — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 260 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
User Input
$ARGUMENTS
You MUST consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
Goal
Provide a concise, actionable status report showing where the current feature stands in the speckit workflow pipeline. Detect which artifacts exist, assess their completeness, and recommend the next action.
Execution Steps
1. Detect Feature Context
Run .specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --paths-only from repo root. Parse JSON for:
REPO_ROOT,BRANCH,FEATURE_DIR,FEATURE_SPEC,IMPL_PLAN,TASKS
For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
If the script fails (not on a feature branch), report:
Not on a feature branch. Current branch: <branch>
Run /speckit.specify to start a new feature.
Then stop.
2. Check Constitution
- Check if
.specify/memory/constitution.mdexists and is non-empty - If it contains
[PLACEHOLDER]or[ALL_CAPS_TOKEN]bracket tokens, mark as "Needs Update" - Extract version from the
**Version**:line if present
3. Scan Feature Artifacts
Run a single combined check for all artifacts. Use this exact script pattern (substituting the real FEATURE_DIR path):
d="<FEATURE_DIR>"
for f in spec.md plan.md tasks.md research.md \
data-model.md quickstart.md; do
[ -f "$d/$f" ] && echo "YES $f" || echo "NO $f"
done
# Contracts directory (must be non-empty)
if [ -d "$d/contracts" ] && \
[ -n "$(ls -A "$d/contracts" 2>/dev/null)" ]; then
echo "YES contracts/ $(ls -1 "$d/contracts" | wc -l)"
else
echo "NO contracts/"
fi
# Checklists
if [ -d "$d/checklists" ]; then
for c in "$d/checklists/"*.md; do
[ -f "$c" ] || continue
bn=$(basename "$c")
t=$(grep -c '\[x\]\|\[X\]\|\[ \]' "$c" || echo 0)
dn=$(grep -c '\[x\]\|\[X\]' "$c" || echo 0)
echo "CL $bn $t $dn"
done
else
echo "NO checklists/"
fi
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 260 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A c4dda3f8aef8
speckit.status is a command published in the GitHub repository rshade/finfocus (5 stars, last pushed 17d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 2,376 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to speckit.status.check, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
review-code
Review a GitHub pull request for the OpenOps codebase. Checks out the PR, analyzes changes through OpenOps-specific lenses, validates findings with confidence scoring, previews before posting, and supports inline comments.
soc2-review
Assess SOC 2 readiness against the Trust Services Criteria and produce a readiness dashboard.
scan
Scan AWS account for cost optimization.
costguard-audit
Audit registered workspaces for CI-minute and cron waste, plus read-only cloud provider billing checks. Quantifies estimated monthly waste and prints a Markdown (or JSON) report.
costguard-fix
Auto-fix CI workflow waste (add timeouts, concurrency, paths-ignore) for registered workspaces. Dry-run preview by default; --apply writes the surgical edits to disk.
langgraph-checkpoints
LangGraph checkpointing and persistence. Use when implementing fault-tolerant workflows, resuming interrupted executions, or debugging with state history. Triggers on LangGraph checkpoint, persistence, fault tolerance, resume workflow, state history, checkpointer, thread state.