Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprintWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint/refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00162 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00065 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00032 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Safe code refactoring: change structure without changing behavior.
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS (file, module, or description of what to refactor)
Workflow:
- Activate the
refactorskill - Run tests — must be green before starting
- Assess: what needs refactoring and why?
- Choose refactoring type(s) from the catalog (extract, move, rename, simplify, restructure)
- Plan: list specific steps in order
- Execute: one refactoring at a time, tests between each
- Commit: each structural change gets its own commit ("refactor: ...")
- If files moved → update CLAUDE.md module map and README
- If architecture changed → create ADR
Tests must pass before AND after every step.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 547e01de107b
refactor is a command published in the GitHub repository rtazima/claude-proj-blueprint (22 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 162 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
adr-check
Check the current change, or a plan, against the decisions that govern it and report a verdict per decision. Read-only.
sruja-confidence-report
Generate a post-AI-edit confidence report showing what changed, what evidence was checked, what risks remain, and what to inspect at 3AM.
sruja-pre-merge-review
Structured review workflow before merging changes. Produces actionable feedback with architecture grounding.
architecture-review
Validate architecture against all GDDs.
review
Architecture-aware code review with Pharaoh.
triage
AI-powered reachability triage for dependency vulnerabilities. Scans for CVEs then searches your source code to estimate whether each vulnerable API is actually called. Outputs a prioritized FOUNDINSOURCE / UNCERTAIN / NOTFOUNDINGREP report.