Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to run-llama/ParseBench. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/run-llama/ParseBench/main/.claude/commands/integrate-pipeline.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/run-llama/ParseBenchWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/run-llama/parsebench/integrate-pipeline)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/run-llama/parsebench/integrate-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/run-llama/parsebench/integrate-pipeline/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/run-llama/parsebench/integrate-pipeline"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/run-llama/parsebench/integrate-pipeline.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01745 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00698 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00349 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00175 |
Grade A, and why
integrate-pipeline scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 175 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Integrate a new document parsing pipeline into ParseBench: $ARGUMENTS
You are integrating a new pipeline into the ParseBench benchmark. The user will provide a pipeline name and any relevant context (API docs, SDK links, product website, etc.). Your job is to create all the files needed so that uv run parse-bench run <pipeline_name> works end-to-end.
Step 1: Understand the provider
Before writing any code, research the provider:
- If the user gave a URL, fetch and read it to understand the API/SDK.
- Determine:
- Product type: Is this a
PARSEprovider (PDF -> markdown) orLAYOUT_DETECTIONprovider (PDF -> bounding boxes)? - Integration style: Cloud API (needs API key), self-hosted model (needs endpoint URL), or local library (no external deps)?
- SDK/API pattern: Does it have a Python SDK? REST API? What's the auth method?
- Input format: Does it accept PDF files directly, or does it need images (page screenshots)?
- Output format: What does the raw response look like? Markdown? HTML? JSON with pages?
- Product type: Is this a
Step 2: Find the closest existing provider to use as a template
Look at the existing providers and pick the best template:
- Cloud API with Python SDK (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, Google): Copy from
src/parse_bench/inference/providers/parse/openai.pyoranthropic_haiku.py - Cloud API with REST calls: Copy from
src/parse_bench/inference/providers/parse/reducto.pyorchunkr.py - Self-hosted vLLM endpoint: Copy from
src/parse_bench/inference/providers/parse/gemma4.pyorqwen3_5.py - Local library (no API): Copy from
src/parse_bench/inference/providers/parse/pymupdf.pyortesseract.py - Layout detection: Copy from
src/parse_bench/inference/providers/layoutdet/docling.py
Read the template file to understand the exact pattern.
Step 3: Create the provider file
Create src/parse_bench/inference/providers/parse/<provider_name>.py (or layoutdet/ for layout detection).
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 175 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A a432856d997e
integrate-pipeline is a command published in the GitHub repository run-llama/ParseBench (618 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,745 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
output
Generate output artifacts from active wiki content — summaries, reports, study guides, slide outlines, timelines, glossaries, comparisons. Outputs are filed back into the wiki.
expect
Diff-aware AI browser testing — reads the git diff, maps changes to affected pages via the route map, generates a targeted test plan, and executes it via agent-browser (Rust daemon + CDP, ARIA-tree-first) with pass/fail reporting. Use when testing UI changes, verifying PRs before merge, or running regression checks on…
brief-compliance-check
Check a LaTeX coursework submission against the requirements in a supplied PDF assessment brief. Use when verifying format, required sections, word limits, or deliverables before submission. Not for general prose proofreading; use $proofread.
fire-verify-uat
Conversational User Acceptance Testing with automatic parallel diagnosis on failures.
proofrag
Evaluate a RAG/LLM app — generate a golden set, judge it, and produce a scorecard.
fire-test
Run Dominion Flow plugin integration tests to verify all commands and integrations work correctly.