Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruslan-korneev/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/deps)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/deps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/deps/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/deps"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/deps.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.01606 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00642 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00321 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00161 |
Grade A, and why
deps scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 270 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Command /architect:deps
Analyze module dependencies at three levels: modules, packages, and layers.
Instructions
Step 1: Discover Modules
Find all modules in the project:
Glob: **/modules/*/__init__.py
Glob: **/apps/*/__init__.py
List module structure:
ls -la {{ path | default: "src/modules" }}
Step 2: Analyze Module Dependencies
For each module, extract import statements:
# Pattern to find cross-module imports
Grep: "from src.modules." in each module
Grep: "import src.modules." in each module
Build dependency matrix:
| Module | Depends On | Dependents |
|---|---|---|
| users | core | orders, payments |
| orders | users, products | payments |
| payments | orders | - |
Step 3: Detect Circular Dependencies
A circular dependency exists when:
- Module A imports Module B
- Module B imports Module A (directly or transitively)
Detection algorithm:
- Build directed graph of module dependencies
- Find strongly connected components (SCC)
- SCC with >1 node = circular dependency
Common circular patterns:
# Direct circular
# users/services.py
from src.modules.orders.services import OrderService
# orders/services.py
from src.modules.users.services import UserService # Circular!
# Transitive circular
# A → B → C → A
Step 4: Analyze Package Dependencies
Check external package dependencies:
# From pyproject.toml or requirements.txt
cat pyproject.toml | grep -A 100 "\[project.dependencies\]"
Categorize dependencies:
- Core: Python stdlib, typing
- Framework: FastAPI, Pydantic, SQLAlchemy
- Infrastructure: asyncpg, redis, celery
- Development: pytest, ruff, mypy
Step 5: Analyze Layer Dependencies
Verify layer dependency rules:
Presentation → Application → Domain ← Infrastructure
Violations to detect:
- Router importing Repository directly (should go through Service)
- Service importing Router (reverse dependency)
- Model importing Service (domain shouldn't know about application)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 270 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A d2dd24e5c1cd
deps is a command published in the GitHub repository ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 1,606 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
debug
A debugging command that sends an error, log, or screenshot to a debugger agent for analysis. The debugger reports confirmed facts separately from possible explanations and does not modify files.
feature:bugfix
Systematic bug investigation and fixing workflow for existing features. Uses code-reviewer for deep analysis, code-consolidator for context, parallel web research for solutions, and atomic phase implementation with review gates.
build-fix
Systematically investigate and fix build errors, TypeScript errors, or test failures with minimal diffs.
data-flow-analysis
Trace how data flows through the system from input to output.
doctor
Check the Modellix CLI install, credential resolution, API connectivity, and balance.
hotfix
Ship a fast branch-based P0 hotfix — diagnose, implement, open a ready-for-review PR, then verify + review after (deferred by design).