Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruslan-korneev/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/lint)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/lint/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/lint"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins/lint.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00451 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00180 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
lint scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Command /lint:check
Run Python code analysis using ruff.
Instructions
-
Run
ruff checkfor the specified path (or current directory if no path is specified):ruff check {{ path | default: "." }} --output-format=grouped -
Analyze the result and group errors by category:
- Style errors (E, W): formatting, whitespace, line length
- Potential bugs (F): unused imports, variables, syntax errors
- Code complexity (C): cognitive complexity, nesting
- Security (S): potential vulnerabilities
- Library-specific (B, UP, etc.)
-
For each error group:
- Show the error count
- Provide examples with line numbers
- Suggest a fix strategy
-
IMPORTANT: NEVER suggest
# noqaas a solution!- Every ruff error has a proper solution
- If the user asks about a specific error, use
/lint:explain
Output Format
## Ruff Check Results
### Errors found: X
#### Style errors (E/W): N
- E501: Lines too long (5 files)
- W291: Trailing whitespace (2 files)
#### Potential bugs (F): N
- F401: Unused imports (3 files)
- F841: Unused variables (1 file)
### Auto-fixable
Run `ruff check --fix` to automatically fix X errors.
### Require manual fix
- E501 in src/services/user.py:45 - split into multiple lines
- ...
Additional Flags
If the user wants more detailed output:
--statistics- show statistics by rules--show-fixes- show which fixes can be applied automatically
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 69 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A a9f0ed8538d7
lint is a command published in the GitHub repository ruslan-korneev/claude-plugins (5 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 451 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
async-check
Vérification Patterns Async Python.
type-coverage
Vérification Couverture des Types Python.
python-dev
Start Python development workflow with architecture, implementation, review, and testing phases.
py-structure
Analyze and recommend project structure improvements. Checks file sizes, layer organization, module splitting, and hexagonal architecture compliance.
setup
Interactive setup for Python LSP development environment.
debug
A debugging command that sends an error, log, or screenshot to a debugger agent for analysis. The debugger reports confirmed facts separately from possible explanations and does not modify files.