Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ruvnet/ruview/code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruvnet/RuViewWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00147 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00073 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00029 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00015 |
Grade A, and why
code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
- code-review — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
What it actually says
code-review
Automated code review with swarm intelligence.
Usage
npx claude-flow github code-review [options]
Options
--pr-number <n>- Pull request to review--focus <areas>- Review focus (security, performance, style)--suggest-fixes- Suggest code fixes
Examples
# Review PR
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456
# Security focus
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456 --focus security
# With fix suggestions
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456 --suggest-fixes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c1bc7608b43a
code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository ruvnet/RuView (92,079 stars, last pushed 2d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 147 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
fix_board
Automatically diagnose and fix PlatformIO board upload/monitor issues.
test
Run tests using uv run test.py with optional arguments.
statusbar-style
Switch the status-bar style (classic / capsule / hairline).
gh-pr
Create (or update) a Pull Request.
gh-review
Address feedback and checks in a Pull Request.
checkpoint
Create a checkpoint by staging the changes you have made using git. usage: git [-v | --version] [-h | --help] [-C ] [-c = ] [--exec-path[= ]] [--html-path] [--man-path] [--info-path] [-p | --paginate | -P | --no-pager] [--no-replace-objects] [--bare] [--git-dir= ] [--work-tree= ] [--namespace= ] [--super-prefix= ]…