code-review

code-review is a command for Claude Code from ruvnet/RuView. It costs 0 tokens per session (147 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

An automated code review command for GitHub pull requests, which are proposed sets of code changes submitted for review. It can focus on security, performance, or coding style and can suggest fixes.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review a pull request, run a security-, performance-, or style-focused review, and receive possible code fixes.
Why use it?
It helps examine proposed changes without reviewing every line manually. Focusing the review makes it easier to look for specific kinds of problems.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: installed under .claude/.

Good fit Use it to review a pull request, run a security-, performance-, or style-focused review, and receive possible code fixes.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/ruvnet/ruview/code-review
About the project

RuView is a WiFi sensing platform that uses disturbances in radio signals, captured by low-cost ESP32 sensors, to detect presence, movement, breathing, and heart rate without cameras or wearables. It is intended for spatial monitoring and smart-home integrations. The catalogue add-ons support workflows for operating and integrating RuView.

ruvnet/RuView · 98,212 stars · on GitHub · cognitum.one

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for code-review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ruvnet/ruview/code-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruvnet/ruview/code-review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruvnet/ruview/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ruvnet/ruview/code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for code-review

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ruvnet/ruview/code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ruvnet/ruview/code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 147 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.00147
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00059
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00029
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00015

Measured 1mo ago against content hash c1bc7608b43a, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

8 near-identical copies found in the catalogue:

.claude/commands/github/code-review.md · 26 lines

What it actually says

code-review

Automated code review with swarm intelligence.

Usage

npx claude-flow github code-review [options]

Options

  • --pr-number <n> - Pull request to review
  • --focus <areas> - Review focus (security, performance, style)
  • --suggest-fixes - Suggest code fixes

Examples

# Review PR
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456

# Security focus
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456 --focus security

# With fix suggestions
npx claude-flow github code-review --pr-number 456 --suggest-fixes
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 1mo ago First seen · 26 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c1bc7608b43a

Subscribe to this mod's changes

code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository ruvnet/RuView (98,212 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 147 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.