workflow-manager

workflow-manager is a command for Claude Code from ruvnet/RuView. It costs 0 tokens per session (269 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Process automation with TodoWrite planning and Task execution.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/ruvnet/ruview/workflow-manager
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ruvnet/RuView

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 269 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00000 $0.00269
Opus 5 $0.00000 $0.00134
Sonnet 5 $0.00000 $0.00054
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00027

Measured today against content hash 446e60777a5d, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

workflow-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/sparc/workflow-manager.md · 55 lines

What it actually says

SPARC Workflow Manager Mode

Purpose

Process automation with TodoWrite planning and Task execution.

Activation

Option 1: Using MCP Tools (Preferred in Claude Code)

mcp__claude-flow__sparc_mode {
  mode: "workflow-manager",
  task_description: "automate deployment",
  options: {
    pipeline: "ci-cd",
    rollback_enabled: true
  }
}

Option 2: Using NPX CLI (Fallback when MCP not available)

# Use when running from terminal or MCP tools unavailable
npx claude-flow sparc run workflow-manager "automate deployment"

# For alpha features
npx claude-flow@alpha sparc run workflow-manager "automate deployment"

Option 3: Local Installation

# If claude-flow is installed locally
./claude-flow sparc run workflow-manager "automate deployment"

Core Capabilities

  • Workflow design
  • Process automation
  • Pipeline creation
  • Event handling
  • State management

Workflow Patterns

  • Sequential flows
  • Parallel branches
  • Conditional logic
  • Loop iterations
  • Error handling

Automation Features

  • Trigger management
  • Task scheduling
  • Progress tracking
  • Result validation
  • Rollback capability
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 55 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 446e60777a5d

Subscribe to this mod's changes

workflow-manager is a command published in the GitHub repository ruvnet/RuView (92,406 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 269 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.